Types of personal pension scheme

Personal pensions have been a great success story in UK pensions since they first became available on 1 July 1988. Despite an almost constant barrage of news stories warning that few individuals are saving enough for retirement, there can be no denying that some tens of millions of individuals have done so through a personal pension. An individual's personal pension scheme may also be used by an employer to fulfil their automatic enrolment obligations, provided it satisfies certain minimum requirements.

Remarkably, the expression is no longer defined in HMRC legislation or practice, and for the purposes of this overview, the expression 'personal pension' means a registered pension scheme which is not an occupational pension scheme (as defined in section 150 of the Finance Act 2004 (FA 2004)) or an annuity policy providing benefits previously accrued under an occupational pension scheme.

Personal pensions are generally provided through one of the following arrangements:

  1. individual personal pensions (insurance-based or other unitised investment-based)

  2. group personal pensions (GPPs)

  3. stakeholder pension schemes

  4. self-invested personal pensions (SIPPs), or

  5. legacy arrangements (such as retirement annuity contracts and free-standing

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Pensions News

Pension Schemes Bill: Employer surplus-payment provisions pass Grand Committee scrutiny unchanged

At the third day of Grand Committee on the Pension Schemes Bill on 19 January 2026, the House of Lords undertook an extensive examination of Clauses 9 (Power to modify scheme to allow for payment of surplus to employer) and 10 (Restrictions on exercise of power to pay surplus), with debate focused on a series of amendments that tested how far the new surplus release regime should be constrained in primary legislation. In particular, peers tabled amendments seeking to change the terminology from ‘surplus’ to ‘assets’, to require surplus to be shared with members, to mandate benefit enhancements including inflation protection, to strengthen member notification or consultation (including trade union involvement) in the surplus release process, to constrain the Secretary of State’s regulation-making powers, to embed actuarial and endgame requirements in statute, and to alter insolvency priorities where employers had previously extracted surplus. The government response, delivered principally by Baroness Sherlock, consistently resisted the amendments to prescriptive statutory rules governing the use of surplus or the processes surrounding its release, and instead defended the Bill’s reliance on trustee discretion, fiduciary duties, actuarial certification, and regulatory oversight by the Pensions Regulator.  All amendments were either withdrawn or not moved following government opposition, and Clauses 9 and 10 were agreed without amendment.

Pensions Schemes Bill makes progress at Lords Grand Committee Stage despite strong reservations on LGPS reforms

The House of Lords Grand Committee (Grand Committee) opened its detailed scrutiny of the Pension Schemes Bill on 12 January 2026. Day 1 of the Grand Committee’s examination began on Chapter 1 of the Bill on the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) and in particular Clauses 1 (Asset pool companies) and 2 (Asset management). Ultimately, all amendments debated on 12 January were withdrawn, and Clauses 1 and 2 were agreed without change. However, the debate raised significant cross-party concern about the breadth of ministerial powers, the heavy reliance on delegated legislation, the protection of fiduciary duty and the extent of ministerial influence over pension investment. On 14 January 2026, the Grand Committee continued its focus on the provisions of Chapter 1 of the Pension Schemes Bill when it agreed Clauses 6 (Mergers of funds), 7 (Amendments of 2013 Act relating to scheme regulations) and 8 (Interpretation of Chapter 1). Again, agreement was reached despite extensive debate highlighting concerns over compulsory mergers, funding positions, contribution prudence and employer affordability, surplus management, transparency, and the impact of local government reorganisation. The government peers maintained that existing statutory, actuarial and governance frameworks are sufficient and that further changes should be considered through consultation rather than primary legislation. The Grand Committee is currently scheduled to sit again on 19, 22 and 26 January 2026 when further detailed examination of the Pension Schemes Bill will continue.

View Pensions by content type :

Popular documents