Types of personal pension scheme

Personal pensions have been a great success story in UK pensions since they first became available on 1 July 1988. Despite an almost constant barrage of news stories warning that few individuals are saving enough for retirement, there can be no denying that some tens of millions of individuals have done so through a personal pension. An individual's personal pension scheme may also be used by an employer to fulfil their automatic enrolment obligations, provided it satisfies certain minimum requirements.

Remarkably, the expression is no longer defined in HMRC legislation or practice, and for the purposes of this overview, the expression 'personal pension' means a registered pension scheme which is not an occupational pension scheme (as defined in section 150 of the Finance Act 2004 (FA 2004)) or an annuity policy providing benefits previously accrued under an occupational pension scheme.

Personal pensions are generally provided through one of the following arrangements:

•
individual personal pensions (insurance-based or other unitised investment-based)
•
group personal pensions (GPPs)
•
stakeholder pension schemes
•
self-invested personal pensions (SIPPs), or
•
legacy arrangements (such as retirement annuity contracts and free-standing

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Pensions News

Pension sector urged to reevaluate long-term financial resilience amid bitcoin treasury growth

Law360: Pension scheme trustees and scheme sponsors should 'not ignore' the growing influence of businesses raising money to buy bitcoin as part of their financial strategies, Cartwright Pension Trusts has said. It encourages trustees and sponsors to reevaluate their long-term financial resilience, considering the rising impact of bitcoin treasury companies. This reassessment is positioned within a broader, forward-looking investment approach that has the potential to transform corporate balance sheets and affect the strength of employer covenants.

Upper Tribunal increases sum of Contribution Notice issued by Regulator’s Determinations Panel (Pelgrave v The Pensions Regulator)

Pensions analysis: On 1 August 2025, the Upper Tribunal (UT) handed down judgment in Pelgrave v The Pensions Regulator [2025] UKUT 00257 (TCC). The case is only the third time the UT has considered the Regulator’s power to issue a Contribution Notice (CN) under section 38 of the Pensions Act 2004 (PeA 2004), and is the first involving an ongoing scheme and employer. The UT decided to increase the sum of the CN from that decided upon by the Regulator’s Determinations Panel, and made comments of general application about (i) the role of the UT when hearing a reference, (ii) the meaning of being ‘party to’ an act in PeA 2004, s 38, (iii) the operation of the ‘material detriment’ test in PeA 2004, s 38A in the context of a continuing employer, and (iv) the assessment of what sum is reasonable to impose by way of liability, including how to take account of benefits received by a Respondent, any tax paid on those benefits, and the passage of time between the relevant events and the UT hearing. Written by Thomas Robinson KC, barrister at Wilberforce Chambers, London.

Pension trustees warned to increase oversight of cyber resilience

Law360: Pension scheme trustees must demand the right evidence on cyber resilience after incidents at Marks & Spencer, Harrods and the Co-op showed how damaging security breaches can be, according to best practice guidance released by Trafalgar House.

PPF submits response to Public Bill Committee’s call for evidence on the Pension Schemes Bill

The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) has submitted its formal response to the government's call for evidence on the Pension Schemes Bill, which is set to be considered in Committee from 2 September 2025. The PPF welcomes the opportunity to support the Public Bill Committee’s examination of the Bill, noting that it contains measures beneficial to both PPF and Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS) members, as well as levy payers. It also acknowledges that some concerns raised by stakeholders fall outside the current scope of the Bill but may be addressed during its passage through Parliament. The PPF response is divided into three sections: provisions specific to the PPF, broader defined benefit (DB) pension measures, and other topical issues relevant to the PPF.