Pension benefits

Pension benefits

Meaning of 'money purchase benefit'

The Pension Schemes Act 1993, s 181, currently defines 'money purchase benefits' as 'benefits the rate or amount of which is calculated by reference to a payment or payments made by the member or by any other person in respect of the member and which fall within Section 181B'.

Broadly speaking, a benefit (other than a pension in payment) will fall within the Pension Schemes Act 1993, s 181B if its amount is calculated solely by reference to assets which are sufficient to meet the resulting liabilities, so that it cannot be possible for a funding deficit to arise.

This amended definition of 'money purchase benefit' was introduced by the government through the Pensions Act 2011, s 29 to reflect the cases Aon Trust Corporation v KPMG [2006] 1 All ER 238 and Bridge Trustees v Houldsworth [2012] 1 All ER 659.

Section 29 came into force on 24 July 2014 with retrospective effect from 1 January 1997.

For more information, see Practice Notes:

•
Money purchase benefits—the statutory definition
•
Money purchase benefits—the transitional regulations [Archived]

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Pensions News

TPR urges industry to adapt and evolve to unlock transformational opportunities of Pension Schemes Bill

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published a blog post by chief executive Nausicaa Delfas outlining the expected impact of the Pension Schemes Bill, how TPR is addressing unfinished business in the pensions system and why the pensions industry must increase its standards even more. To support implementation, TPR has launched an innovation support service to encourage early engagement with new ideas and reduce regulatory barriers. It is also developing a new trusteeship strategy focused on raising professional standards in line with other professions and corporate governance standards, with an emphasis on accountability, agility, and data-led decision-making. Delfas urged trustees, advisers, and administrators to adapt, evolve and collaborate to ensure the reforms deliver lasting benefits for savers across the UK.

Pensions weekly highlights—12 June 2025

This week's edition of Pensions weekly highlights includes a review of key news stories, as well as dates for your diary and trackers.

Pension scheme’s failure to fulfil commitment to provide information about annual allowance was maladministration, despite no legal obligation (Dr S, CAS-60994-H2H2)

Pensions analysis: The Pensions Ombudsman has upheld a complaint about member communication. Martin Scott of gunnercooke LLP looks at the decision.

Equality Act 2010 provisions refer to biological sex, regardless of gender recognition certificate (For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers)

Public Law analysis: The Supreme Court held that the terms ‘man’, ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) refer to biological sex. Its relevant provisions cannot be interpreted as including ‘certificated sex’ under a gender recognition certificate (GRC) without rendering them incoherent and unworkable. In relation to sex discrimination, a person has the protected characteristic of their biological sex only. The relevant provisions of the EqA 2010 fall within the section 9(3) of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA 2004) and so displace the rule in s 9(1) of that Act that the gender of a person with a GRC is for all purposes the acquired gender. This is a very significant judgment on the meaning of the EqA 2010, and on the law of discrimination particularly as it affects women and trans people. It must be understood by all those who advise on or are concerned with discrimination law, particularly employers, service providers and public authorities. Written by the LexisNexis Public Law team.