Costs and charges

Costs and charges

Since 2012, increasing attention has been given to the charges borne by members of work-based pension schemes, both in terms of the nature and level of these charges. This arose out of a concern that members of defined contribution (DC) schemes, especially work-based schemes which are subject to auto-enrolment requirements, were not getting value for money from their pension investment.

There are now various restrictions applicable to charges borne by members in occupational pension schemes and workplace personal pension schemes.

Restrictions on member-borne commissions

Member-borne commissions are arrangements whereby the service provider remunerates a pension adviser for advice or services provided to members or an employer and recoups this cost by imposing increased charges on members' pension pots.

The drive to restrict such commissions started on 31 December 2012 with the Retail Distribution Review (RDR), which resulted in pension providers of new group personal pension schemes, group stakeholder schemes and group self-invested personal pension being banned from paying commission to advisers.

For further information, see Practice Note: The Retail Distribution Review and pensions [Archived].

On 6 April 2016, the ban was extended to apply to:

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Pensions News

IFRS Foundation publishes near-final guidance on reporting uncertainties in financial statements

The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation has published near-final examples that illustrate how companies can improve disclosure of uncertainties in their financial statements, using climate-related scenarios as illustrations. Developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in response to stakeholder feedback regarding insufficient uncertainty reporting, these examples are applicable to all types of uncertainties, not solely those related to climate. The IASB collaborated with the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) to ensure alignment with sustainability disclosure requirements. Final examples are anticipated in October 2025.

New research from TPR shows schemes still suffering from ‘data debt’ in preparation for pensions dashboards readiness

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published new research on 24 July 2025 which shows that although 80% of pension schemes are on track to connect to the central digital architecture by or before their connect-by date in the Department for Work and Pension’s guidance, there is still a lot of work to do for schemes on making sure data about the value of a saver’s pension is available digitally and is up-to-date. TPR research finds that one in four schemes still hold some data in non-digital form and only half of the schemes offering defined benefit (DB) pension benefits have recent DB value data for all members, while in addition many schemes still need to deliver their data improvement plans.

PPI research on low earners aims to bridge gaps in understanding to assist pensions policy

The Pensions Policy Institute (PPI) has published the first report in its series titled ‘From Payslip to Pension: Life Course Impacts on Retirement Saving Among Low Earners’. The PPI project is designed to address gaps in understanding low earners within the context of pensions policy, particularly when configuring automatic enrolment parameters that may inadvertently disadvantage this group. The report finds that low earners represent a diverse group with varying reasons for low earnings and different levels of financial security, making it challenging to develop policies that adequately serve all subgroups. This complexity is particularly evident in pensions policy, where features of automatic enrolment such as the trigger income and lower earnings limit rely on earnings thresholds. The PPI research also identifies which low earners are most likely to continue facing challenges over time, providing valuable insights for potential policy interventions.

Minister for Pensions hosts roundtable on ‘Pound for Pound’ initiative in shift from cost to Value for Money

The Minister for Pensions, Torsten Bell MP, has hosted a roundtable with regulators and leading pension providers to support a joined-up approach to Value for Money (VFM) in pensions. The event marked the first public discussion of the ‘Pound for Pound’ (‘£4£’) initiative, aimed at shifting the UK market from cost-based comparisons to broader value-based metrics, shifting market conversations away from cost towards value. This shift is essential for the success of the government’s proposed approach set out in the Pension Schemes Bill 2025. Insights from Australia’s superannuation system were central to the session, highlighting how clear benchmarking, transparency and regulatory oversight have transformed both member outcomes and the understanding of value in Australia. Intended to inform the impending regulatory consultation on VFM metrics, the superannuation system formed a key reference point as the discussion explored how lessons from Australia and insights from providers could shape regulatory thinking and support the development of the Pension Schemes Bill. Roundtable participants including the Department for Work and Pension, the Financial Conduct Authority, Pensions UK and a number of the Mansion House Accord signatories, agreed that now is the time for government, regulators and industry to collaborate in shaping and embedding a robust, fit-for-purpose VFM regime.