Home / Dispute Resolution / Costs and funding / Principles of costs recovery

Legal News

Spotlight on costs between a party and its solicitors (Zakirov v Newmans Solicitors)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published on: 12 November 2012

Published by a LexisNexis Dispute Resolution expert

Table of contents

Practical implications
Court details
Facts
Judgment
Should the costs be paid on the standard or indemnity basis?
Was the defendant solicitor a litigant in person?
What rates can the defendant recover?

Article summary

The High Court has considered a number of costs issues in respect of a dispute between a solicitor and her client. It held that costs should be paid on an indemnity basis as the case was well outside the norm and the claimant’s conduct had been unreasonable to a significant degree. In addition, it found that a solicitor acting for herself but in her firm’s name was not a litigant in person for the purposes of the costs cap under the CPR. This followed findings by the court that allegations of forgery and dishonesty against the solicitor were completely without foundation.

Popular documents

Fixed costs—position prior to 1 October 2023

Fixed costs—position prior to 1 October 2023This Practice Note considers the fixed costs position prior to 1 October 2023 under Part 45. It explains the purpose of fixed costs and the different categories of claims and costs to which they are applicable.Note, the extension of the fixed costs came

Appeals—costs recovery

Appeals—costs recoveryThis Practice Note provides information on the appeal court’s power to order costs, whether these costs can be summarily assessed and/or ordered on an indemnity basis. whether it is possible to recover the costs incurred during an appeal. It considers the Supreme Court’s power

Fixed costs—fast track trial costs (position prior to 1 October 2023)

Fixed costs—fast track trial costs (position prior to 1 October 2023)Note, the extension of the fixed costs regime came into force on 1 October 2023. For all civil cases, other than personal injury and disease, the extended fixed costs regime applies (unless the case is specifically excluded) where

Injunctions—costs recovery

Injunctions—costs recoveryThis Practice Note considers the costs position following an application for an interim injunction, the general approach taken by the courts and in what circumstances there will be a departure from the general position. This Practice Note also considers the court’s approach