Home / Arbitration / Investment treaty arbitration / Understanding investment treaty arbitration

Legal News

Settlement reached in mining dispute ten years after registering ICSID case (Tethyan Copper v Pakistan)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 23 March 2022
Published by a Law360 reporter

Table of contents

  • What is this development about?

Article summary

Law360: Pakistan has resolved a decade-old dispute with Barrick Gold that resulted in a US$6bn arbitral award issued to the Canadian miner, under which the Reko Diq project, believed to hold one of the world's largest undeveloped copper and gold deposits, will be restarted.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

4 News
View More
8 Practice notes
View More
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

4 News
View More
8 Practice notes
View More

Popular documents

Umbrella clauses in investment treaty arbitration

Umbrella clauses in investment treaty arbitrationWhat is an umbrella clause?An umbrella clause (known also as an umbrella agreement or an observance of undertakings clause) is a provision in a bilateral investment treaty (BIT) by which a state agrees to comply with all of its obligations owed to

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Contributory negligence in personal injury claims

Contributory negligence in personal injury claimsContributory negligence is a partial defence which can lead to a discount in damages.Other defences may also be relevant. See Practice Notes: Did the claimant consent to the risk of injury? and Was the claimant involved in an illegal activity?If a