Home / Dispute Resolution / Costs and funding / Cost orders

Legal News

Non-party costs order against a political party who prevented the timely settlement of a defamation claim for political reasons (Barron v Collins)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published on: 20 February 2018

Published by a LexisNexis Dispute Resolution expert

Table of contents

What are the practical implications of this case?
What was the background?
What did the court decide?
Case details

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: What is the court to make of a situation in which a political party has involved itself as a non-party in a defamation claim that was being brought against one of its Parliamentary candidates? Would mere funding of the defence give rise to a liabilty for costs? Would such a liability arise if the party took a ‘deliberate, informed and calculated’ decision to avoid the claim settling until after a forthcoming General Election? Written by Dr Mark Friston, Barrister, Hailsham Chambers.

Popular documents

Pre-action—costs recovery

Pre-action—costs recoveryThis Practice Note considers the recovery of costs incurred pre-action. It sets out provisions in the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981), CPR 44, pre-action protocols and court guides. It notes the provisions for civil cases that come within the fixed costs regime on or after

Fixed costs—position prior to 1 October 2023

Fixed costs—position prior to 1 October 2023This Practice Note considers the fixed costs position prior to 1 October 2023 under Part 45. It explains the purpose of fixed costs and the different categories of claims and costs to which they are applicable.Note, the extension of the fixed costs came

Appeals—costs recovery

Appeals—costs recoveryThis Practice Note provides information on the appeal court’s power to order costs, whether these costs can be summarily assessed and/or ordered on an indemnity basis. whether it is possible to recover the costs incurred during an appeal. It considers the Supreme Court’s power

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedings

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedingsThe general rule for detailed assessmentThe general rule for when detailed assessment is to take place is set out in CPR 47.1 which provides that the costs of any part of the proceedings are not to be determined by detailed assessment until the