Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: The claimant applied to extend the ‘relevant period’ of a defendant’s Part 36 offer. Master Thornett held that the court did not have jurisdiction to make the order sought. The case summarises the steps a party can (and can’t) take if it needs more time to consider a Part 36 offer. Written by James Yapp, barrister at Temple Garden Chambers.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial