powered by Lexis^®PSL

Home / Dispute Resolution / Claims and remedies / Corporate disputes

Legal News

Liquidator’s claim dismissed over alleged fraudulent payments (Instant Access Properties Ltd v Rosser; Murphy v Rosser)

Liquidator’s claim dismissed over alleged fraudulent payments (Instant Access Properties Ltd v Rosser; Murphy v Rosser)

Published on: 27 April 2018

Published by: LexisPSL

Liquidator’s claim dismissed over alleged fraudulent payments (Instant Access Properties Ltd v Rosser; Murphy v Rosser)
What are the practical implications of this case?
What was the background?
What did the court decide?

Article summary

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: The High Court has dismissed a claim brought by a liquidator to recover payments made by an insolvent company. The liquidators claimed that payments to corporate property developers had been made fraudulently. Elliot Green, licensed insolvency practitioner of Oury Clark, London and Slough, considers some of the potential practical implications from this judgment and considers the wider implications for these types of cases. Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Contractual damages—pecuniary losses

This Practice Note considers the different categories of contractual damages that may be available for financial loss (pecuniary loss), ie expectation-based damages, reliance-based damages and gains-based damages.For guidance on contractual damages generally, see Practice Note: Contractual

LEXISNEXIS

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)

This Practice Note considers the law governing the procedural law of arbitration proceedings (the curial law or lex arbitri) and how it is determined under the law of England and Wales (England and English are used as convenient shorthand).The procedural law of the arbitral proceedingsThe procedural

LEXISNEXIS

Money Laundering Regulations 2017—simplified due diligence

You may apply simplified customer due diligence (SDD) measures in relation to particular business relationships or transactions which you determine present a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, having taken into account:•your organisation-wide risk assessment—see Practice Note:

LEXISNEXIS

Letter to client on disclosure obligations under CPR 31

This Precedent letter covers disclosure obligations under CPR 31. It does not apply to proceedings subject to the disclosure pilot scheme under CPR PD 51U. For guidance on the disclosure pilot scheme, see Practice Note: Business and Property Courts—the disclosure pilot scheme. For a client letter on