Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What is the legal background to the case?
- What is the factual background to the case?
- What did the court find?
- Case details
Article summary
Planning analysis: The court has upheld a surcharge issued by a collecting authority against a self-builder in respect of community infrastructure levy (CIL) liability, for commencing development without a commencement notice having been submitted. The decision reminds developers of the importance of adhering strictly to the procedural requirements of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010, SI 2010/948 (the CIL Regulations), even if the collecting authority is for all intents and purposes aware of the date on which works commenced.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial