Home / Dispute Resolution / Costs and funding / Funding arrangements

Legal News

Court of Appeal upholds need for informed approval of success fees (Herbert v HH Law Ltd)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published on: 04 April 2019

Published by a LexisNexis Dispute Resolution expert

Table of contents

What are the practical implications of this case?
What was the background?
What did the court decide?

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: In Herbert v HH Law Ltd, the Court of Appeal upheld the reduction of a success fee under a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) on the basis that a claimant had not provided informed approval of the level of the success fee; and that a starting point of 100% regardless of risk was unusual. However, it reinstated an after the event (ATE) insurance premium that had not been on the solicitor’s invoice on the basis that such premiums are not solicitors’ disbursements and therefore do not need to be included within an invoice. Written by Alex Bagnall, costs lawyer at Total Legal Solutions.

Popular documents

Security for costs—what is it, its use and the court's discretion

Security for costs—what is it, its use and the court's discretionThis Practice Note considers security for costs under CPR 25. It explains what an order for security for costs is, who it may be sought against as well as the circumstances in which such an order is generally not available. It

Pre-action—costs recovery

Pre-action—costs recoveryThis Practice Note considers the recovery of costs incurred pre-action. It sets out provisions in the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981), CPR 44, pre-action protocols and court guides. It notes the provisions for civil cases that come within the fixed costs regime on or after

Summary assessment—principles

Summary assessment—principlesThis Practice Note explains what a summary assessment of costs is and sets out the key principles to understanding summary assessment, ie when summary assessment can be sought, the circumstances in which summary assessment will not take place and which members of the

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedings

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedingsThe general rule for detailed assessmentThe general rule for when detailed assessment is to take place is set out in CPR 47.1 which provides that the costs of any part of the proceedings are not to be determined by detailed assessment until the