Table of contents
- Original news
- What is the significance of this decision?
- How did the court approach the issue of retrocession?
- What does this tell us about the structure/treatment of reinsurance contracts?
- Could this decision affect future reinsurance agreements?
- What should lawyers take from this case?
Article summary
Commercial analysis: how should reinsurance contracts be construed in relation to the underlying insurance contract where coverage is in dispute? Stephen Netherway, partner and head of the insurance and reinsurance group and the financial institutions insurance sector group at CMS, and Alaina Wadsworth, an associate in the firm’s insurance and reinsurance group, examine the High Court’s decision in Tokio Marine v Novae.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial