Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: Mr Justice Henry Carr was confronted by an application for an anti-suit injunction which was eventually compromised without a hearing upon undertakings being supplied. No agreement was reached as to costs. He declared that there is no convention in such circumstances that costs be ignored altogether. Rather, it was the duty of the court to determine where liability should fall without embarking upon an expensive, elaborate inquiry. Case analysis by Professor Dominic Regan, City Law School London, and honorary special adviser to the Association of Costs Lawyers.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial