Home / IP / Confidential Information / Confidential information

Legal News

AstraZeneca keeps generics off shelves ahead of appeal

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 02 April 2025
Published by a Law360 reporter

Article summary

Law360, London: Counsel for AstraZeneca convinced the Court of Appeal on 31 March 2025 to review a decision to let rival Glenmark release its generic version of a billion-dollar diabetes treatment under an agreement that the company can ship supplies of the drug already packed in trucks as long as it does not move ahead with retail sales in the meantime.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
4 Practice notes
View More
1 Precedents
2 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
4 Practice notes
View More
1 Precedents
2 Q&As

Popular documents

Early leavers—preservation

Early leavers—preservationFORTHCOMING DEVELOPMENT: Section 10 of the Finance Act 2022 will increase the normal minimum pension age (NMPA) from 55 to 57 on 6 April 2028 (save for members of the firefighters, police and armed forces public service pension schemes).The Finance Act 2022 will also give

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to

Where are misrepresentations made? Jurisdictional traps for the unwary (Bellmare Holdings Ltd v Wells)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The High Court has provided concise guidance as to how misrepresentation should be analysed when considering jurisdictional gateways. Under Article 5(3) of the Lugano Convention, in negligent misstatement cases, the place of the event giving rise to damage is normally