Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: An application made to re-open grounds of appeal on which permission was refused under CPR 52.30 has failed. There was no significant failure in the reasoning of the judge who refused permission, and it was wrong for the application to be made only after the substantive appeal on other grounds had been determined. Written by Phillip Patterson, barrister, Gatehouse Chambers.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial