Table of contents
- Challenges to collective claims and consumer protection
- Exploring solutions and future outlook
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: The Supreme Court recently decided in R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) (Appellants) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others) that litigation funding agreements which entitle the funder to recover a percentage of damages are damages-based agreements (DBAs). DBAs cannot be used in Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) collective actions where litigation funding is essential due to the cost. Clare Ducksbury, CEO, and Natasha Day, PR and communications executive at Case Pilots examine the implications of the PACCAR decision for collective claims in the UK.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial