Home / IP / Trade marks/passing off / Trade mark and passing off disputes

Legal News

AG opines on the meaning of ‘use with due cause’ in EU trade mark cases (Kenzo Tsujimoto v EUIPO)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 08 December 2017
Published by a LexisNexis IP expert

Table of contents

  • What are the practical implications of this opinion?
  • What was this opinion about?
  • What did the AG decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

IP analysis: Advocate General (AG) Sharpston has opined on the meaning of ‘use with due cause’ in Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009 (now replaced by Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) (the EU Trade Mark Regulation). In the AG’s opinion, use of a person’s forename in a mark does not automatically constitute use with due cause.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
2 Practice notes
5 Q&As
View More
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
2 Practice notes
5 Q&As
View More

Popular documents

Passing off—goodwill, misrepresentation and damage

Passing off—goodwill, misrepresentation and damageWhat is passing off?Passing off is a common law tort which protects rights that are not capable of registration or are difficult to register as trade marks (eg colours, get-up and packaging), or rights that had not been registered formally, but have

The Company Names Tribunal

The Company Names TribunalEstablishment and function of the Company Names TribunalThe Company Names Tribunal (the Tribunal) was established pursuant to the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006).Under CA 2006, s 69 an applicant to the Tribunal may object to a company's registered name on the basis that it is

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some