Table of contents
- Original news
- Summary
- What were the facts?
- What was the Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s decision?
- What is the impact of this determination?
Article summary
Pensions analysis: In the Pensions Ombudsman determination of Mr S, CAS-64392-H8Z8, the Deputy Pensions Ombudsman (DPO) has rejected a complaint that a scheme failed to carry out appropriate due diligence on a pension transfer. Furthermore, Mr S was aware of the risks of pension liberation and was likely to have transferred in any event. Martin Scott of gunnercooke LLP looks at the decision.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial