Taxi and private hire vehicles

This topic explains the application, purpose, content and structure of the licensing of hackney cabs and private hire vehicles as it applies to England and Wales.

Licensing authorities

Licensing is primarily the responsibility of local authorities. In England and Wales, these may be district councils, metropolitan district councils or unitary authorities. In Wales, licensing responsibility lies with county councils or county district councils.

In London, the legislation provides that the licensing authority is Transport for London (‘TfL’—formerly the Secretary of State and the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police) and the licensing functions are devolved to London Taxi and Private Hire, part of TfL.

The Mayor has responsibility for creating the strategic plan for transport for London, including taxis and private hire vehicles.

Local authorities determine the extent to which powers are delegated. Many have a licensing committee and sub-committees, with general responsibility for all licensing functions, while others delegate decisions to officers. Councils can lay down licensing policies. They can also determine the application procedure and the circumstances in which a licence may or may not be granted.

Although there is still no statutory requirement

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Local Government News

Local Government weekly highlights—30 October 2025

This week’s edition of Local Government weekly highlights includes coverage of Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v Revenue and Customs Commissioners, in which the Supreme Court allowed an HMRC appeal, finding VAT chargeable on NHS Trust carparking services and case analysis of R (SK) v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, in which the Court rejected the interim order requiring the LA to provide accommodation within 20 minutes travel of hospital due to tragic circumstances and Save Greater Manchester Green Belt Ltd v SSHCLG, confirming that the ‘exceptional circumstances’ test for Green Belt changes is a matter of planning judgment; expert analysis of the publication of Homes for London: A package of support for housebuilding in the capital by the government and Mayor of London and on the government announcement of a consultation on proposed reforms to the Local Government Pension Scheme; case reports on R (Gloria Elsy Rodriguez Robles) v Lewisham LBC, in which the Court upheld the LA’s housing allocation policy for overcrowded households; R (SAG) v Governing Body of Winchmore School, allowing an appeal against the dismissal of a JR claim challenging a school’s GDC decision to uphold a pupil’s permanent exclusion; S v Islington LBC, in which the Court rejected an application to prevent the LA from infant vaccination, rejecting the Article 8 challenge under ChA 1989; and Sidley Medical Practice v CQC, in which the FTT confirmed the suspension of a healthcare provider over regulatory breaches. It includes coverage of the commencement of the first phase of Awaab’s Law and MHCLG’s confirmation of local government reorganisation in Surrey subject to Parliamentary approval. It includes further updates on Healthcare, Social housing, Pensions, Education, Children’s social care, Social care, Public procurement, Governance, Planning, Licensing and Local government finance.

View Local Government by content type :

Popular documents