Copyright disputes

This subtopic outlines and provides guidance on the steps to take where there may be a claim for copyright infringement.

UK copyright law is mainly set out in the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA 1988).

Copyright infringement

CDPA 1988 gives the copyright owner exclusive rights in the UK to carry out various acts in relation to the copyright work. Activities set out in CDPA 1988, carried out by those other than the copyright owner, without permission, will infringe the owner’s exclusive rights unless certain exceptions or defences apply. For an introduction to the law of copyright, see Practice Note: IP—new starter copyright guide and Precedent: Protecting copyright—training materials.

Before issuing proceedings, a claimant should establish that copyright subsists in the relevant work, that they own it and that the copyright has been infringed. Infringement can be primary or secondary. Broadly, there will be primary infringement if a substantial part of the work is reproduced as a result of copying. There will be secondary infringement where an infringing copy is knowingly imported, possessed, sold or distributed. Copyright infringement is of particular importance in creative

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest IP News

The trade mark licensing ‘black hole’ (Lifestyle Equities v Sportsdirect)

IP analysis: This case is of interest to trade mark lawyers who advise clients on and litigate trade marks, particularly where the trade marks are licensed. In the UK, trade mark licenses can be registered, which confers benefits on the licensee, but there are also more subtle benefits for the licensor, which are explored in this judgment. Although the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994) sets out the rules of the statutory licensing scheme, its effects and who it applies to, practical questions can and do arise. This case provides a close analysis of the scheme, and answers three discrete questions. First, sub-licensees of an exclusive license need not necessarily be registered to recover damages; second, non-exclusive sub licensees may not be joined to proceedings; and third, while late registration of a licence can cure non-registration, there are significant safety mechanisms to prevent over-recovery or improper recovery of damages. Written by Sam Fisher, associate at CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP.

UK music collective wins action to halt mass claim over ‘black box’ royalties

MLex: A planned mass claim against a UK music copyright collective over alleged unfair distribution of royalty payments won’t be allowed to go to trial, judges at the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruled today. David Rowntree, known as the drummer from British rock band Blur, had sought compensation from the Performing Rights Society (PRS) for thousands of songwriters over ‘black box’ royalties—ones that can’t be matched and paid to the correct artist.

UPC won't refer costs questions to top EU court

Law360, London: The Unified Patent Court (UPC) said 20 August 2025 that it cannot refer questions of its framework or procedures to the EU's top court, ruling that such issues fall outside the EU's jurisdiction.