Q&As

What is the procedure to be followed for a landlord to obtain possession of an assured shorthold tenancy where the tenant has sublet without consent? Would this be the same where there is no written tenancy and the original tenant’s whereabouts are unknown?

read titleRead full title
Produced in partnership with Christopher Snell of New Square Chambers
Published on: 07 February 2017
imgtext

In considering the correct procedure to adopt when seeking possession of a property that has been unlawfully sublet by the assured shorthold tenancy (AST) holder, it is first necessary to recognise that there are, potentially, two separate persons who should be named as the defendants to the claim for possession:

  1. the person to whom the original AST was granted, and

  2. the person presently in occupation of the property

Although it is clear that the original AST holder is no longer in possession of the property, it remains important to obtain an order for possession against that person so as to:

  1. formally bring to an end the extant AST

  2. safeguard against any potential claim for unlawful eviction

The AST holder

The party to whom the AST was granted is relatively

Christopher Snell
Christopher Snell

Advice and representation in all areas of commercial and chancery litigation.

Instructed on behalf of both retail and investment banks [including BNY Mellon; HSBC; Royal Bank of Scotland] in relation to a variety of commercial issues.

Retained in relation to a wide range of international disputes; including disputes in the Bahamas; Isle of Man; BVI and Kuwait.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Popular documents