The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note considers legal professional privilege (LPP), which is made up of legal advice privilege and litigation privilege. It considers the various criteria for both types of LPP including confidentiality of communications, the dominant purpose and legal context of the communications over which privilege is being asserted and to whom the communication has been copied. It looks at the meaning, for the purposes of asserting privilege, of client, legal adviser, legal advice and anticipated litigation. It addresses the various exceptions to privilege (ie circumstances in which privilege will not arise) including the iniquity exception (in circumstances of fraud or crime), where statute overrides privilege, etc. The position on copy documents, collated, selected and extracted documents and translations is also considered. Finally, practical tips on LPP and privilege generally are offered.
Legal professional privilege (LPP) (which is often referred to simply as ‘privilege’ in this Practice Note) is an umbrella term encompassing legal advice privilege and litigation privilege.
For information on the general principles associated with privilege including the rationale for those principles and the advantage of being able to assert privilege, see Practice Note: Privilege—general principles.
Legal advice privilege protects from inspection:
between A (the client or internal agent) and B (the professional legal adviser or in-house lawyer)
for the sole or dominant purpose of giving or obtaining
legal advice or assistance
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Broadly, the doctrine of overreaching enables purchasers (which includes tenants and mortgagees) in good faith for money or money’s worth to rely solely on the legal title. In the case of registered land, this means the entries entered on the register of title, as it records ownership of the legal
An intention to create legal relations is requiredThere are various situations in which a court will hold that an agreement is not binding because, though supported by consideration, it was made without any intention of creating legal relations (see, eg, Blue v Ashley).Did the parties intend to
Source of the doctrine of the separation of powersThe origins of the doctrine are often traced to John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1689), in which he identified the 'executive' and 'legislative' powers as needing to be separate.‘… it may be too great a temptation to human frailty, apt to
Disposal and devolutionThe equity of redemption arises as soon as the mortgage is made. It is an interest in the land which the mortgagor can:•transfer, lease or mortgage inter vivos, or•by will (it passes on intestacy)No cloggingIt is a fundamental principle of a mortgage that there must be no clog
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.