The following Energy practice note produced in partnership with Phillip Ashley, Judith Aldersey-Williams, David Rutherford, and Leontine Mathew of CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note introduces take-or-pay clauses in the energy sector and considers some of the regulatory and competition law issues regularly encountered when considering take-or-pay clauses in the energy contracts.
For more information on drafting take-or-pay clauses and the common features of such clauses, see Practice Note: Drafting take-or-pay clauses in energy contracts.
For more information on to English Court’s attitude to take-or-pay clauses and a thorough consideration of take-or-pay clauses and the rule on penalties, see Practice Note: Take-or-pay clauses in energy contracts: the rule on penalties.
A take-or-pay clause is a contractual provision whereby a buyer agrees to pay for a minimum quantity of a good, or service, to which the relevant contract relates, whether or not that minimum quantity is taken by the buyer.
Take-or-pay clauses are used in contracts across a range of industries. In the energy sector, such clauses are commonly found in liquefied natural gas (‘LNG’) sale and purchase agreements (‘SPAs’), natural gas SPAs, power purchase agreements and other long-term purchase or supply arrangements. Similar ‘send-or-pay’ clauses are found in gas transportation agreements.
By requiring the buyer to make payments regardless of whether it does or does not take a minimum quantity of a good or service, take-or-pay clauses seek to guarantee the seller a consistent revenue stream. This might be of particular relevance in relation
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Practical completion marks the end of the construction period of a project, when the works are 'finished' and the employer can occupy and/or use them. Practical completion also typically marks the start of the defects liability period/maintenance period.As explained below, practical completion is an
This Practice Note considers the meaning and use of conditions precedent in commercial arrangements. It also considers typical conditions precedent and drafting issues.What are conditions precedent?A condition precedent in a commercial contract details an event which must take place before:•a
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
Millett LJ subdivided types of constructive trust into two categories, distinguishing between:•the constructive trust proper, where equity intervenes to prevent the legal owner from unconscionably denying the beneficial interest of another (known as the institutional constructive trust)•the
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.