Q&As
A freeholder has a right of light for the benefit of its property and then grants a 999–year lease of that property which reserves rights of light, excludes implied rights and (where the tenant has not held the lease long enough), acquired rights. Can a freeholder get an injunction where it has no way itself of enjoying the right of light for the next 999 years? Is there any case law on this?
A right of light is an easement. It is a right enjoyed in respect of a building for it to receive the natural light that passes over someone else’s land and then enters through defined apertures (such as windows or skylights) in that building. The right of light entitles the beneficiary to receive sufficient natural light so that the rooms served by apertures can be used for their ordinary purpose (Colls v Home & Colonial Stores Ltd).
As with other easements, a right of light can come to an end as a result of ‘abandonment’. There are other ways in which
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.