Property rights

Applications under TOLATA 1996

An application under section 14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA 1996) may be made by a trustee of land, or a beneficiary with an interest in property subject to a trust of land. The court has a broad discretionary range of powers to make orders regarding the exercise of the trustees’ functions, or to the nature and extent of beneficiaries’ interests, including a sale or postponement of sale.

TOLATA 1996, s 15 requires the court to consider:

  1. the intention of the trust creator or creators

  2. the purposes for which the property subject to the trust is held

  3. the welfare of any minor, and

  4. the interests of any secured creditor

See Practice Note: Eligibility to apply under TOLATA 1996. The following Precedent letter may be sent by practitioners to their clients: Cohabitant claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996—client guide.

TOLATA 1996: case law

Beneficial interests are determined and declared under established principles of trust law. The leading case regarding cohabitant disputes

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Family News

Cafcass guidance on conflicting assessments in public law cases

The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published new guidance for local authorities and Cafcass for cases where the views of the children’s guardian (and therefore their independent advice to the court) and the assessment of a local authority social worker and/or the independent reviewing officer fundamentally differ on the final care plan or interim arrangements for a child. The guidance applies to all children in care and supervision order applications under section 31 of the Children Act 1989 and deprivation of liberty applications. The guidance sets out the process that should be followed at any point during proceedings where a divergence arises and should be completed before final recommendations are submitted to court. The guidance requires that a pre-final hearing meeting be convened to identify and document the points of difference for the court. It includes suggestions for structuring the pre-final hearing meeting, a template agenda and a template for sharing the agreed rationale with the court. The guidance is not intended to be used to agree a joint position, rather to make sure that recommendations to court include a clear explanation about why the children’s guardian, the local authority social worker and/or the independent reviewing officer have reached fundamentally different positions. The explanation must set out what the points of difference are so that the judge in the case can better understand these. It remains for the court to decide what is safe and in the best interests of the child.

View Family by content type :

Popular documents