Limitation

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis

Limitation Act 1980

When seeking to bring a claim, it is important to ensure that it is brought within the time frames provided for under the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980). A failure to do so could enable a defendant to have a complete defence against the claim.

It is likewise important to know when the limitation period starts, the impact of its expiry and which party bears the burden of proof of showing whether the limitation period has expired.

For more information, see Practice Note: Limitation Act 1980—general application.

Amendments to statements of case

For specific guidance on the courts’ discretion to permit amendments to statements of case after the expiry of a limitation period pursuant to LA 1980, s 35, CPR 17.4 and CPR 19.6, see Practice Notes:

  1. •

    Limitation—amendments to statements of case, set-offs and counterclaims

  2. •

    Limitation—amending a party name and substituting or adding (joinder) of parties

  3. •

    Limitation and amendments—illustrative decisions

Principal limitation periods

Limitation

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—8 January 2026

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including the speech of the President of the King’s Bench Division at the Mayflower Lecture 2025 on artificial intelligence and the Court of Appeal decision in Afan Valley Ltd v Lupton Fawcett LLP (appeals); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

The Law Society’s AI strategy and response to government

The Law Society has responded to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology’s call for evidence on the AI Growth Lab, stressing the need for a proportionate regulatory approach that supports innovation while maintaining professional standards. In a press release dated 6 January 2026, the sector’s widespread willingness to embrace lawtech was highlighted, with two-thirds of lawyers said to ‘already use AI tools in their work’, alongside an ongoing uncertainty as to the risks and ‘exact requirements for data security, oversight and liability’. Separately, The Law Society’s ‘Introduction to lawtech’ guide published on 29 December 2025 observed that client demand for ‘greater efficiency, transparency and cost control, especially in corporate legal services’ has been a key driver for AI usage, with larger firms leading adoption and medium-sized firms catching up. The Law Society says it will continue to work with the government to ensure AI benefits both firms and clients, with its strategy focused on the following three key outcomes: i) innovation in legal service delivery; ii) an effective AI regulatory landscape, influenced by the legal sector; and iii) integrity through responsible AI use, supporting the rule of law and access to justice. Links to consultation responses and downloadable submissions on a range of AI-related issues, including data processing, ransomware resilience and the use of AI outputs in criminal proceedings (among others), are included on The Law Society’s ‘AI and lawtech: government policy and regulation’ page (updated on 18 December 2025), which also invites members to share their views and identify any gaps in support or guidance.

HMCTS publishes guidance on applications to reclaim money paid into the High Court Chancery Division

HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published guidance on applications to reclaim money held by the High Court, Chancery Division. The guidance, published on 18 December 2025, concerns the following three scenarios: (i) surplus funds from property repossession where entitled parties cannot be located; (ii) trust money paid into court by trustees unable to locate beneficiaries; and (iii) funds relating to dissentient shareholders in company takeovers. Applicants must complete Form N244 (application notice) and Form CH60 (evidence of identity and declaration) as well as paying a non-refundable fee (currently £61). Before applying, applicants must check the unclaimed court money service and may need to ask the Court Funds Office to conduct a search for the amount held. Solicitors and trust research/beneficiary tracing firms must file via HMCTS E-Filing, while litigants in person may use either online filing or postal submission to the Chancery Division Miscellaneous Payments Team.

Master of the Rolls updates solicitors’ guideline hourly rates for 2026

The Master of the Rolls has announced updated guideline hourly rates for solicitors, effective in England and Wales from 1 January 2026, implementing a 2.28% uplift to reflect more recent service producer price inflation figures up to Q1 2025. Sir Geoffrey Vos, as Head of Civil Justice, has confirmed that the update follows the Civil Justice Council’s recommendation as part of its strategic review of costs, following a previous 6.66% inflationary uplift applied in January 2024, and has indicated that a Civil Justice Council working group is examining whether new guideline rates should also be developed for counsel’s fees and complex commercial work, with an interim report expected later in 2026.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Standstill agreements to suspend or extend limitation

Standstill agreements to suspend or extend limitationThis Practice Note provides guidance on standstill agreements (or tolling agreements) used for either suspending the running of limitation or extending the period of limitation. It explains the distinction between such standstill agreements and

Non-compliance with pre-action provisions

Non-compliance with pre-action provisionsThis Practice Note considers when non-compliance with a pre-action protocol or the Practice Direction Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols may result in a party being sanctioned and what those sanctions might be.For more general guidance on the extent to which

What is the limitation period for a breach of fiduciary duty claim? Does the period run from the date of

What is the limitation period for a breach of fiduciary duty claim? Does the period run from the date of breach or the date when the breach could reasonably have been discovered?Regarding limitation periods generally, see Practice Notes: Limitation—the principal limitation periods and Limitation Act

In what circumstances can you assign a claim or cause of action?

In what circumstances can you assign a claim or cause of action?This Practice Note sets out the requirements and considerations for permitted assignment of claims or causes of action in English civil litigation.For guidance on how to assign a claim or cause of action, with particular consideration
Standstill agreements to suspend or extend limitation

Standstill agreements to suspend or extend limitation

Standstill agreements to suspend or extend limitationThis Practice Note provides guidance on standstill agreements (or tolling agreements) used for either suspending the running of limitation or extending the period of limitation. It explains the distinction between such standstill agreements and

Non-compliance with pre-action provisions

Non-compliance with pre-action provisions

Non-compliance with pre-action provisionsThis Practice Note considers when non-compliance with a pre-action protocol or the Practice Direction Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols may result in a party being sanctioned and what those sanctions might be.For more general guidance on the extent to which

What is the limitation period for a breach of fiduciary duty claim? Does the period run from the date of

What is the limitation period for a breach of fiduciary duty claim? Does the period run from the date of

What is the limitation period for a breach of fiduciary duty claim? Does the period run from the date of breach or the date when the breach could reasonably have been discovered?Regarding limitation periods generally, see Practice Notes: Limitation—the principal limitation periods and Limitation Act

In what circumstances can you assign a claim or cause of action?

In what circumstances can you assign a claim or cause of action?

In what circumstances can you assign a claim or cause of action?This Practice Note sets out the requirements and considerations for permitted assignment of claims or causes of action in English civil litigation.For guidance on how to assign a claim or cause of action, with particular consideration