Principles of costs recovery

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

General principles of costs recovery

Costs recovery is governed by several principles starting with the application of the general rule. For an introduction to some key resources in this area, see Practice Notes: Costs glossary and Costs precedents.

Cost orders—the general rule and the court's discretion

The general rule on costs recovery is that the unsuccessful party will pay the successful party’s costs (CPR 44.2(2)(a)). However, the court has the discretion to make a different order (CPR 44.2(2)(b)). It can be seen from the authorities that the general rule might not apply for example where there has been a failure to recover the amount claimed, where there are sanctions or where the claim is struck out for being disproportionate. The general rule will also not apply in the specific circumstances set out in CPR 44.2(3). In addition, the court will be prepared to depart from the general rule when it is not in fact clear who is the winning party. For guidance, see Practice Notes: Costs orders—the general rule and Costs orders—the court's discretion.

Costs—recovery of costs under contractual

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Anti-enforcement injunction to prevent enforcement of an English judgment overseas (Federal Government of Nigeria and another v Williams)

Dispute Resolution analysis: This case concerns a claim by the Federal Government of Nigeria and the Attorney General of the Federal Government of Nigeria for the setting aside of a default judgment granted on 9 November 2018 in proceedings brought against them by the defendant (‘Dr Williams’) for c. USD 15 million (plus costs) in Dr Williams’ favour, on the ground that the default judgment was obtained fraudulently. It is well established that an anti-enforcement injunction is available to the English Court, as an equitable remedy, to restrain a party from seeking to enforce a foreign judgment, even in respect of enforcement in other foreign countries. Relying on those principles, in what is believed to be the first case of its kind, an anti-enforcement injunction was granted by the Commercial Court to restrain Dr Williams from enforcing the judgment of an English court overseas (rather than the more common situation in which an anti-enforcement injunction is used to restrain the enforcement of a foreign judgment). Written by Natalie Todd, partner at Cooke, Young & Keidan and Andrew Woolsey, associate at Cooke, Young & Keidan.

Tribunal warns fee disputes could undermine CPO regime

Law360, London: The chair of a UK competition tribunal raised concerns on 10 September 2025 about the effect 'another' fee dispute between funders and lawyers could have on the collective actions regime during a hearing on unclaimed damages from a claim over train fares.

Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2025 published

HM Courts & Tribunals Judiciary has published updated guidance for court users in England and Wales on judicial review in the Administrative Court. The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2025 provides general information on how judicial reviews should be conducted, including the relevant statutory provisions, procedural rules, practice directions and case law. The guide also includes contact details for the court, information on the relevant forms and fees and current service addresses for government departments. The 2025 edition replaces the 2024 edition. While the majority of the guidance is unchanged, we have summarised the key substantive updates. Notably, the 2025 edition introduces a specific warning on the use of AI in the preparation of skeleton arguments and the penalties for citing false authorities.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—11 September 2025

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including the September 2025 update to the Chancery Guide and its accompanying Practice Note and the Court of Appeal decision in Farley v Paymaster (1836) Ltd (trading as Equiniti) (Information Commissioner intervening) (confidential information); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Pre-action—costs recovery

Pre-action—costs recoveryThis Practice Note considers the recovery of costs incurred pre-action. It sets out provisions in the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981), CPR 44, pre-action protocols and court guides. It notes the provisions for civil cases that come within the fixed costs regime on or after

Fixed costs—fast track trial costs (position prior to 1 October 2023)

Fixed costs—fast track trial costs (position prior to 1 October 2023)Note, the extension of the fixed costs regime came into force on 1 October 2023. For all civil cases, other than personal injury and disease, the extended fixed costs regime applies (unless the case is specifically excluded) where

Injunctions—costs recovery

Injunctions—costs recoveryThis Practice Note considers the costs position following an application for an interim injunction, the general approach taken by the courts and in what circumstances there will be a departure from the general position. This Practice Note also considers the court’s approach

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedings

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedingsThe general rule for detailed assessmentThe general rule for when detailed assessment is to take place is set out in CPR 47.1 which provides that the costs of any part of the proceedings are not to be determined by detailed assessment until the
Pre-action—costs recovery

Pre-action—costs recovery

Pre-action—costs recoveryThis Practice Note considers the recovery of costs incurred pre-action. It sets out provisions in the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981), CPR 44, pre-action protocols and court guides. It notes the provisions for civil cases that come within the fixed costs regime on or after

Fixed costs—fast track trial costs (position prior to 1 October 2023)

Fixed costs—fast track trial costs (position prior to 1 October 2023)

Fixed costs—fast track trial costs (position prior to 1 October 2023)Note, the extension of the fixed costs regime came into force on 1 October 2023. For all civil cases, other than personal injury and disease, the extended fixed costs regime applies (unless the case is specifically excluded) where

Injunctions—costs recovery

Injunctions—costs recovery

Injunctions—costs recoveryThis Practice Note considers the costs position following an application for an interim injunction, the general approach taken by the courts and in what circumstances there will be a departure from the general position. This Practice Note also considers the court’s approach

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedings

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedings

Forthwith orders—costs prior to end of proceedingsThe general rule for detailed assessmentThe general rule for when detailed assessment is to take place is set out in CPR 47.1 which provides that the costs of any part of the proceedings are not to be determined by detailed assessment until the