It is generally accepted that the possession by one person of a tangible chattel belonging to another person is essential in order for bailment to arise1. Being in possession of the goods of another, however, does not necessarily render someone a bailee; there must be a voluntary possession2. The question of possession may arise in several ways in relation to bailment.
First, there are numerous cases where the requirement of a transfer of possession is in issue. It has been suggested that to create bailment by way of hire3, possession of the hired chattel is not necessary where a person is supplied by the lessor
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
It is generally accepted that the possession by one person of a tangible chattel belonging to another person is essential in order for bailment to arise1. Being in possession of the goods of another, however, does not necessarily render someone a bailee; there must be a voluntary possession2. The question of possession may arise in several ways in relation to bailment.
First, there are numerous cases where the requirement of a transfer of possession is in issue. It has been suggested that to create bailment by way of hire3, possession of the hired chattel is not necessary where a person is supplied by the lessor
To view this document in full, take a free 7 day trial of LexisNexis and benefit from:
- Access to 20 million legal documents from over 1,600 Sources as part of our archive
- The ability to download court judgments within 30 minutes of their release
- New enactments available within 24 hours of publication on legislation.gov.uk
- Exclusive Sources to LexisNexis include; Halsbury’s Laws, Atkin’s Court Forms, Encyclopedia of Forms and Precedents and the All England Law Reports
Continue reading
To continue reading Halsbury's Laws of England, register for a free Lexis+ trial.