VAT on property

VAT on property

There are multiple VAT issues that arise in a property context. For a checklist-style summary of the key VAT issues to consider when undertaking a property transaction, see: VAT on property transactions—checklist.

The default position is that most supplies of interests in or rights over land and buildings (including freehold sales and leasing) are exempt from VAT, but there are many exceptions.

The effect of making an exempt supply of land is that no VAT is payable, but the person making the supply cannot usually recover any of the VAT (the input tax) incurred on their expenses, such as in relation to building work and fees.

In practice, the exceptions mean that most dealings in commercial property are not, in fact, exempt, and that exemption is only really the norm for lettings of residential property. Since exemption is not always a desirable result, active steps may need to be taken to fall outside it.

Where exemption applies, it will cover the sale price or premium, any rent and anything else paid by way of consideration for the interest in land. This generally extends to service charges

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

FTT considers time limits on VAT assessments in the context of missing trader fraud (Jeneruhl Trade Ltd and another v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Jeneruhl Trade Ltd and another v HMRC, the First-Tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) found in favour of HMRC regarding the applicable time limit for raising an assessment relating to missing trader fraud.

FTT refuses HMRC’s application to set aside barring order (Carbon Six Engineering v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Carbon Six Engineering Ltd v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) refused HMRC’s application to set aside a barring order made following its failure to comply with an ‘unless order’.

FTT decides that amounts paid into contractor loan scheme were earnings which HMRC had validly assessed to income tax (O’Brien v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In O’Brien v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) decided that amounts paid into a contractor loan scheme were earnings which HMRC had validly assessed to income tax. Applying the ‘redirection’ principle, the FTT decided that income tax arose when the taxpayer redirected his earnings to an employee benefit trust (EBT) established to try to avoid income tax by making loans from those earnings. Further, the FTT decided that HMRC had satisfied the relevant conditions for making a discovery assessment; in particular, the taxpayer’s return lacked enough information for a hypothetical HMRC officer to be reasonably expected to have been aware that the return was insufficient, despite the scheme having been disclosed to HMRC under the disclosure of tax avoidance schemes rules (DOTAS).

Tax weekly highlights—5 February 2026

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) completion of the House of Commons committee stage of Finance Bill 2026, (2) second reading of the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill in the House of Lords, (3) analysis of the Court of Appeal’s decision in FS Commercial Ltd v HMRC concerning failure to produce VAT invoices to support claims for input tax deductions, (4) analysis of the Upper Tribunal’s decision in Mark Glenn Ltd v HMRC concerning the scope of the VAT zero rate for supplies to disabled persons of services of adapting goods to suit their condition, and (5) analysis of the First-tier Tax Tribunal’s decision in Hall v HMRC concerning a challenge to a joint and several liability notice under the anti-phoenixing rules in Schedule 13 to the Finance Act 2020.