Secondary buyouts

Secondary buyouts

A secondary buyout (SBO) is a private equity-backed buyout of a business that has previously been the subject of a private equity-backed buyout (such as a management buyout (MBO)). SBOs are one method open to private equity investors who are looking to exit an investment (with other exit options being taking their investment public through an IPO, or selling the target business to another business active within the same industry).

The ‘new’ private equity investor will usually be choosing an investment that suits the weighting of its portfolio (eg in particular sectors) and its funding cycles and will be motivated by further growth potential in the business and the opportunity for a relatively low-risk investment, especially where the existing management team stay on.

The acquisition is usually structured as a share purchase and the company being acquired (target) will usually be the company that was the acquisition vehicle for the previous buyout, or (perhaps more likely) the top company of the acquisition group for the previous buyout—ie ‘old’ Newco 1 will be the target in the SBO.

As for an MBO, it is common in an

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

FTT decides sponsorship payments taxable on cricketer despite purported assignment to his company (Collingwood v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Collingwood, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) dismissed the taxpayer's appeal against closure notices amending his tax returns, holding that the taxpayer (a former professional cricketer) was personally liable to income tax on sponsorship payments received under various agreements, notwithstanding the purported assignment of his publicity rights to his company.

Supreme Court rules VAT chargeable on success fees paid after VAT grouping severed (The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v HMRC)

The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the appeal of Prudential Assurance Company Ltd (Prudential), ruling that VAT was correctly charged on success fees paid to a company called Silverfleet Capital Limited (Silverfleet) after it left Prudential's VAT group, even though the underlying services were performed while both companies were group members. The judgment clarifies that Article 64 of Directive 2006/112/EC (the Principal VAT Directive (PVD)), applies to contingent 'successive payments' like success fees, with the chargeable event occurring when payment crystallises rather than when services are performed. As well as summarising the decision, this News Analysis contains commentary from Flossie Skinner, Tax Assistant, at Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen LLP on the implications of the judgment.

Tax weekly highlights—11 September 2025

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential Assurance Company upholding the decision that the success fees were subject to VAT, and (2) the High Court in Hotelbeds allowing the taxpayer’s judicial review claim.

Chancellor warned against cutting pension tax relief

Law360: Possible changes to pension tax relief rules that could be announced in the forthcoming autumn budget 2025 to raise additional revenue are fraught with risks for Chancellor Rachel Reeves and could break government manifesto commitments, Lane Clark & Peacock LLP (LCP) has said.