Basic principles of income tax

Background

Income tax affects most individuals. It is collected through a number of methods, including Pay As You Earn (PAYE), self assessment and deduction at source. The main pieces of legislation are the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (ITEPA 2003), the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005 and the Income Tax Act 2007 (ITA 2007). For further guidance on the legislation relevant to income tax (including the tax rewrite project), see Practice Note: What is the basis of income tax?

Income tax on the earnings of an employed individual is collected on a monthly or weekly basis, depending on how the individual is paid. The tax collection is administered by an individual’s employer through PAYE under which the employer has an obligation to pay the income tax owed by the individual directly to HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).If the individual also has income from other sources which are received gross, such as rental income, or net of tax at a rate below the individual’s marginal rate of tax, they must account for the additional income tax through the self assessment

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Tax News

Market value, distributions and notional transactions—key SDLT lessons from Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC

Tax analysis: In Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC, the Court of Appeal considered the basis on which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) should be assessed and whether that resulted in SDLT being paid on the market value, the actual consideration paid, or on some other basis for a complex transaction within a corporate group. The taxpayer argued that the ‘Case 3’ exception under section 54(4) of the Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003) applied, which would result in SDLT being charged on the actual consideration. HMRC argued that the exception did not apply, which would result in SDLT being paid on the market value of the property. Alternatively, HMRC argued that if the exception did apply then the anti-avoidance provisions at section 75A FA 2003 applied, potentially resulting in an even higher SDLT charge. The Court of Appeal held that although the Case 3 exception applied, the anti-avoidance provision in FA 2003, s 75A also applied. This resulted in SDLT being assessed on an aggregate amount that was even higher than the property's market value (although HMRC did not seek to increase its assessment beyond market value). Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. As explained by Jon Stevens, partner, and Rory Clarke, solicitor, at DWF Law LLP, this decision deals with the interaction of a number of complex SDLT provisions and clarifies the SDLT provisions relating to transfers to connected companies and the SDLT anti-avoidance provisions, with implications for corporate structuring and tax planning.

View Tax by content type :

Popular documents