Oil and gas taxation

FORTHCOMING CHANGES: At Budget 2025, the government announced that when the energy profits levy comes to an end, it will be replaced by a permanent measure called the oil and gas profits mechanism (OGPM). The main features of the OGPM will include the following:

  1. it will be a revenue-based tax and will apply to upstream oil and gas companies operating in the UK or UK continental shelf

  2. a company will be in scope of the OGPM where it disposes of oil or gas and the consideration received (ie the realised price the company receives) for the disposal exceeds the relevant threshold. The thresholds for the financial year 2026–27 will be US$90 per barrel for oil and 90p per therm for gas. For subsequent years, thresholds will be adjusted using the preceding year’s CPI, and

  3. the OGPM tax rate will be 35%

The government has stated that it ‘will continue to work with the sector to deliver [the OGPM] as effectively and efficiently as possible’. It will then introduce legislation in Finance Bill 2026–27 to provide for the OGPM

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Tax News

Market value, distributions and notional transactions—key SDLT lessons from Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC

Tax analysis: In Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC, the Court of Appeal considered the basis on which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) should be assessed and whether that resulted in SDLT being paid on the market value, the actual consideration paid, or on some other basis for a complex transaction within a corporate group. The taxpayer argued that the ‘Case 3’ exception under section 54(4) of the Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003) applied, which would result in SDLT being charged on the actual consideration. HMRC argued that the exception did not apply, which would result in SDLT being paid on the market value of the property. Alternatively, HMRC argued that if the exception did apply then the anti-avoidance provisions at FA 2003, s 75A applied, potentially resulting in an even higher SDLT charge. The Court of Appeal held that although the Case 3 exception applied, the anti-avoidance provision in FA 2003, s 75A also applied. This resulted in SDLT being assessed on an aggregate amount that was even higher than the property's market value (although HMRC did not seek to increase its assessment beyond market value). Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. As explained by Jon Stevens, partner, and Rory Clarke, solicitor, at DWF Law LLP, this decision deals with the interaction of a number of complex SDLT provisions and clarifies the SDLT provisions relating to transfers to connected companies and the SDLT anti-avoidance provisions, with implications for corporate structuring and tax planning.

View Tax by content type :

Popular documents