Oil and gas taxation

FORTHCOMING CHANGES: At Budget 2025, the government announced that when the energy profits levy comes to an end, it will be replaced by a permanent measure called the oil and gas profits mechanism (OGPM). The main features of the OGPM will include the following:

•
it will be a revenue-based tax and will apply to upstream oil and gas companies operating in the UK or UK continental shelf
•
a company will be in scope of the OGPM where it disposes of oil or gas and the consideration received (ie the realised price the company receives) for the disposal exceeds the relevant threshold. The thresholds for the financial year 2026–27 will be US$90 per barrel for oil and 90p per therm for gas. For subsequent years, thresholds will be adjusted using the preceding year’s CPI, and
•
the OGPM tax rate will be 35%

The government has stated that it ‘will continue to work with the sector to deliver [the OGPM] as effectively and efficiently as possible’. It will then introduce legislation in Finance Bill 2026–27 to provide for the OGPM

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

Budget 2025—The oil and gas price mechanism: a replacement for the energy profits levy

Tax analysis: At Budget 2025, the government announced that when it expires, the energy profits levy (EPL) will be replaced by the oil and gas price mechanism (OGPM) as a longer-term strategy for the UK tax system to respond to oil and gas price shocks. Jake Landman, Partner and Head of Tax Disputes and Investigations at Pinsent Masons, analyses the government’s plans and considers their practical consequences.

Finance Bill 2026—Share exchanges and reorganisations: anti-avoidance

Tax analysis: Following the decisions in Delinian Ltd (formerly Euromoney Institutional Investor plc) v HMRC and Wilkinson v HMRC legislation is being introduced, effective from Budget 2025 on 26 November 2025, to allow HMRC to dissect a transaction into its constituent parts to counteract avoidance. This is facilitated by a number of changes to sections 137 and 138 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (TCGA 1992). Philip Ridgway, barrister, Temple Tax Chambers and member of the LexisNexis Tax Consulting Editorial Board, considers the background to the legislation and scope of the new provisions.

Court of Appeal confirms SDLT anti-avoidance provisions trump connected companies market value rule exception (The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC, the Court of Appeal held that the distribution-related exception from the SDLT connected companies market value rule, found at section 54(4) of Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003), applied to prevent the market value rule in FA 2003, s 53 from operating on the land transaction in question. However, HMRC succeeded in its alternative argument under the SDLT anti-avoidance provisions contained at FA 2003, s 75A. The Court found that the scheme in question gave rise to a higher SDLT charge on the notional transaction than on the actual steps implemented, meaning FA 2003, s 75A was engaged and the imposition of a market value SDLT charge was ultimately upheld. The taxpayer’s appeal was therefore dismissed.

Tax weekly highlights—11 December 2025

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) News Analysis on the new measures contained in Finance Bill 2026 (FB 2026) to tackle the promotion of marketed tax avoidance schemes, (2) News Analysis on publication of the Final Report of the independent review of the Loan Charge and the government’s response to that Report, (3) News Analysis on the FB 2026 measure that provides an SDRT relief for new UK listings, (4) News Analysis on the FTT’s refusal to allow amortisation deductions for goodwill created by a predecessor partnership in County Insurance Services Ltd v HMRC, and (5) News Analysis on the FTT’s finding that mixed-use SDLT rates applied to the acquisition of an apartment with a basement storage unit in Sehgal v HMRC.