Environmental taxes

What is an environmental tax or levy?

A tax is a compulsory contribution to state revenue, levied by the government on workers' income and business profits, or added to the cost of some goods, services and transactions.

To levy can mean to impose a tax on an individual or a business or to impose a penalty.

HM Treasury has defined an environmental tax as one which meets the following three principles:

  1. the tax is explicitly linked to the government's environmental objectives

  2. the primary objective of the tax is to encourage environmentally positive behaviour change, and

  3. the tax is structured in relation to environmental objectives—for example, the more polluting the behaviour, the greater the tax levied

Fuel duty, vehicle excise duty and air passenger duty are not classed as environmental taxes.

Types of environmental tax

Landfill tax

Landfill tax is a tax payable on disposals of waste at licensed landfill sites and on certain prescribed landfill activities.

The objective of the tax is to encourage efforts to minimise the amount of waste produced and encourage the use of non-landfill waste management options, such as recycling, composting

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Tax News

Market value, distributions and notional transactions—key SDLT lessons from Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC

Tax analysis: In Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC, the Court of Appeal considered the basis on which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) should be assessed and whether that resulted in SDLT being paid on the market value, the actual consideration paid, or on some other basis for a complex transaction within a corporate group. The taxpayer argued that the ‘Case 3’ exception under section 54(4) of the Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003) applied, which would result in SDLT being charged on the actual consideration. HMRC argued that the exception did not apply, which would result in SDLT being paid on the market value of the property. Alternatively, HMRC argued that if the exception did apply then the anti-avoidance provisions at section 75A FA 2003 applied, potentially resulting in an even higher SDLT charge. The Court of Appeal held that although the Case 3 exception applied, the anti-avoidance provision in FA 2003, s 75A also applied. This resulted in SDLT being assessed on an aggregate amount that was even higher than the property's market value (although HMRC did not seek to increase its assessment beyond market value). Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. As explained by Jon Stevens, partner, and Rory Clarke, solicitor, at DWF Law LLP, this decision deals with the interaction of a number of complex SDLT provisions and clarifies the SDLT provisions relating to transfers to connected companies and the SDLT anti-avoidance provisions, with implications for corporate structuring and tax planning.

View Tax by content type :

Popular documents