Trackers

Key UK tax rates, thresholds and allowances

This Practice Note provides a summary of the following current UK tax rates, thresholds and allowances: corporation tax, income tax, National Insurance contributions (NICs), pay as you earn (PAYE), capital gains tax (CGT), VAT, insurance premium tax (IPT), stamp duty, stamp duty reserve tax (SDRT), stamp duty land tax in England and Northern Ireland (SDLT), land and buildings transaction tax in Scotland (LBTT), land transaction tax in Wales (LTT), annual tax on enveloped dwellings (ATED), UK withholding on yearly interest, and oil and gas tax. It also sets out relevant rates of interest, such as HMRC’s rates as well as the Bank of England official bank rate of interest.

The full tracker is available here: Key UK tax rates, thresholds and allowances.

Key dates for tax lawyers—2026 and beyond

This Practice Note contains a list of key dates for tax lawyers in 2024 and beyond and is updated on an ongoing basis.

The full tracker is available here: Key dates for tax lawyers—2026 and beyond.

Case tracker

The case tracker displays the current status and most recent developments

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Tax News

Upper Tribunal denies EIS relief as trade not commenced (Putney Power and Piston Heating v HMRC)

Tax analysis: The Upper Tribunal (UT) has held that the First-tier Tax Tribunal (the FTT) made a material error of law in its approach to determining when a trade has ‘begun to be carried on’ by a company for the purposes of qualifying for Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) relief under section 179(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act 2007 (ITA 2007). The FTT had identified a set of principles by reference to factors which were of relevance in previous cases and applied those ‘legal’ principles to determine that neither Putney Power Limited (‘Putney’) nor Piston Hearing Services Ltd (‘Piston’) had begun to carry on a trade by the relevant date of 4 April 2018. The UT set aside the FTT’s decision on the basis that the FTT had sought to apply a principles-based test which did not exist as a matter of law. The proper approach requires a multi-factorial evaluation of all of the circumstances in the case at hand. The UT re-made the decision but ultimately reached the same conclusion as the FTT, dismissing the appeals of both Putney and Piston and holding that neither company had commenced trading by the relevant date. The decision is significant because it clarifies that there is no strict legal test for when a trade commences: the question remains highly fact sensitive and will be determined by reference to the particular facts and circumstances of each case. Written by Kate Ison (partner at Macfarlanes LLP) and Victoria Braid (associate at macfarlanes LLP).

View Tax by content type :

Popular documents