Trusts in commercial settings

Although the common law trust has historically been used as a vehicle to hold property for successive generations within a family, it has also long been a feature in many kinds of commercial arrangements.

What is a trust?

A basic definition is a legal arrangement which involves a person (the ‘settlor’) transferring legal title to assets to another person or body (the ‘trustee’) to hold for the benefit of one or more persons (the ‘beneficiaries’), which may include the settlor. The terms of the trust are usually set out in a written instrument, often in the form of a deed. The trust imposes onerous duties on the trustee; failure to fulfil those duties properly may result in the trustee being held personally liable. It is important to note that the trust itself does not have any legal personality; rather, it is the trustee who is the principal actor and carries out the purposes of the trust in his own name.

For more information, see Practice Note: An introduction to trusts for commercial lawyers.

It is important to note that the trust has certain unique characteristics

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Tax News

Market value, distributions and notional transactions—key SDLT lessons from Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC

Tax analysis: In Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC, the Court of Appeal considered the basis on which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) should be assessed and whether that resulted in SDLT being paid on the market value, the actual consideration paid, or on some other basis for a complex transaction within a corporate group. The taxpayer argued that the ‘Case 3’ exception under section 54(4) of the Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003) applied, which would result in SDLT being charged on the actual consideration. HMRC argued that the exception did not apply, which would result in SDLT being paid on the market value of the property. Alternatively, HMRC argued that if the exception did apply then the anti-avoidance provisions at section 75A FA 2003 applied, potentially resulting in an even higher SDLT charge. The Court of Appeal held that although the Case 3 exception applied, the anti-avoidance provision in FA 2003, s 75A also applied. This resulted in SDLT being assessed on an aggregate amount that was even higher than the property's market value (although HMRC did not seek to increase its assessment beyond market value). Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. As explained by Jon Stevens, partner, and Rory Clarke, solicitor, at DWF Law LLP, this decision deals with the interaction of a number of complex SDLT provisions and clarifies the SDLT provisions relating to transfers to connected companies and the SDLT anti-avoidance provisions, with implications for corporate structuring and tax planning.

View Tax by content type :

Popular documents