Refine By
Clear all filter
About 91012 results for "*"
Q&As
Effect of death of a partner A partnership is not a legal entity but is a relationship between partners. It is defined in the Partnership Act 1890 (PA 1890) as ‘the relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit’. When the composition of a partnership changes by the death of a partner, PA 1890, s 33 provides that the partnership in existence immediately before the change is dissolved. However, most partnership agreements allow for the partnership to continue the business despite that change in composition, and it will not be necessary to wind up its affairs as long as there are still two or more continuing
Q&As
Repayment of capital on leaving the partnership Section 24(1) of the Partnership Act 1890 (PA 1890) provides that, subject to any agreement express or implied between the partners, all the partners are entitled to share equally in the capital and profits of the business, and must contribute equally towards the losses whether of capital or otherwise sustained by the firm. In Popat v Shonchhatra, the Court of Appeal considered PA 1890, s 24(1) and observed that if the partners contribute capital in unequal proportions but do not agree to share it in those proportions, they will each be entitled to an equal share of the firm’s capital. Conversely if there is the slightest indication of an implied agreement between the partners that their shares of capital should correspond with their contributions to it, this will suffice to displace the statutory presumption that they are entitled to share equally. In
Q&As
A partnership is not a legal entity but is a relationship between partners. It is defined in the Partnership Act 1890 as ‘the relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit’. The partners in a partnership are the persons who are 'carrying on a business in common with a view of profit'.
Q&As
This Q&A addresses whether, where title to some land is registered in the name of an individual partner or partners, the partnership which is made up of those partners has the right to grant a commercial lease of that land in the name of the partnership. Partnerships In English law, a partnership is not a legal person (ie a legal entity). In Sadler v Whiteman, it was said by Farwell J: ‘In English law a firm as such has no existence; partners carry on business both as principals and as agents for each other within the scope of the partnership business; the firm name is a mere expression, not a legal entity, although for convenience… it may be used for the sake
Q&As
Why is it relevant? The question may arise in the context of a security review or formulating an enforcement strategy for the realisation of assets of the partnership. Can a partnership grant a floating charge over its assets? The answer to the question depends on the type of partnership: General partnership A general partnership has no separate legal identity and cannot grant a floating charge over its assets. Except where a qualifying agricultural floating charge exists, an administrator may only be appointed to an partnership by either • an order of the court pursuant to paragraph 11 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) as modified by the Insolvent Partnership Order 1994 (SI 1994/2421) upon application
Q&As
The starting point is section 23 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973), which gives the court jurisdiction to make lump sum orders and specifies which orders the court can make. In particular, MCA 1973, s 23(1)(c) provides as follows: '(1) On granting a decree of divorce, a decree of nullity of marriage or a decree of judicial separation or at any time thereafter (whether, in the case of a decree of divorce or of nullity of marriage, before or after the decree is made absolute), the court may make any one or more of the following orders, that is to say: [...] (c) an order that either party to the marriage shall pay to the other such lump sum or sums as may be so specified' Statute therefore provides for a
Q&As
An assignment is ‘an immediate transfer of an existing proprietary right, vested or contingent from one party to another’. The default position is that in the absence of an express provision either prohibiting or conditionalising the assignment of rights, the benefit under a contract can be assigned. Where a contract
Q&As
In accordance with the glossary to the CPR, a stay imposes a hold on proceedings. No procedural steps may be taken except for any steps allowed by the rules or the terms of the stay. Proceedings will continue if a stay is lifted. Stays are usually stated to be for a specified period. If you wish to take a step within the period of the stay, you will need to make an application to request that the stay is lifted. For additional guidance on stays of proceedings and their effect, see Practice Note: Stay of civil proceedings—when can you apply to stay a claim? CPR 19 sets out the rules
Q&As
This Q&A looks at whether a party can correct mistakes in a pay less notice that was given in response to a default payment notice for a final account. We have focused on the position under the Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) forms of contract or similar contracts which contain provisions for the final account to become final and conclusive after a defined period. We have also assumed the mistakes are substantive in nature rather than, for example, merely typographical. The payee (ie the party receiving the payment and therefore the pay less notice) cannot correct mistakes in a pay less notice. If the payee disagrees with the contents of a pay less notice and wishes to challenge the same, its only options are to refer the dispute to adjudication or to litigate the same in court or arbitration (depending on what is provided for in the contract). Where there are time limits or other conditions
Q&As
While the question focuses on subparagraph (a) of CPR PD 40E, para.2.4, regard should be had to the breadth of the provision as a whole. Subparagraph (b) of CPR PD 40E states: ‘…(b) no action is taken (other than internally) in response to the draft judgment, before the judgment is handed down.’ Therefore, the question is whether disclosing the existence of an embargoed judgment to third parties would be a non-internal action in response to the draft judgment. The statement ‘we have the draft judgment which is due to be handed down on X date’ seems innocuous. However, a client is more likely to want to draw attention to the
Q&As
In accordance with the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, 25.6 the court’s permission is required for expert evidence to be adduced in family proceedings. In addition, a party may not instruct an expert in proceedings relating to children, and a child may not be medically or psychiatrically examined or otherwise assessed for the purposes of the provision of expert evidence in the proceedings, without first obtaining permission from the court (sections 13(2)–13(5) of the Children and Families Act 2014 (CFA 2014)). Specific provision in relation to public children proceedings is set out at FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, 25.6(a), which provides that an application for permission should be made ‘as soon as possible’ and ‘in Part 4 proceedings referred to in rule 12.2 and in so far as practicable other public law proceedings referred to in that rule, no later than a Case Management Hearing’. See also Practice Note: Public law children procedure—Public Law Outline: overview and key principles. Duty
Q&As
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Accounts Rules set the requirements for how solicitors operate their accounts and the types of financial activities they can undertake on behalf of their clients. See Practice Note: SRA Accounts Rules—law firms for full consideration of the rules. Two of the key principles of the rules are to keep client money separate from the firm’s money and to only use client money for its intended purpose. SRA Accounts Rules Part 2 set out the requirements for solicitors in respect of client money and client accounts. Rule 2.1(a) says that client money is held or received by a solicitor if it relates to a regulated service delivered to that client.