The Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel (CSPRP) has published a thematic analysis examining how child neglect is defined, identified and addressed in England, based on analysis of 100 rapid reviews and 34 Local Child Safeguarding Practice Reviews. The report found that neglect is the most common form of child maltreatment and is present in more than half of serious safeguarding incidents, but responses are frequently delayed because statutory concepts such as ‘persistence’ and ‘serious impairment’ are interpreted inconsistently across agencies, contributing to high intervention thresholds and fragmented practice. The analysis found that practitioners often struggle to identify cumulative harm, are reluctant to explicitly label neglect, particularly where poverty or parental vulnerability are involved, and do not consistently centre children’s lived experiences within assessments. The report concluded that neglect can have significant long-term effects across all stages of childhood, including developmental delay, poor mental health, behavioural difficulties and social exclusion, while evidence-based assessment tools and multi-agency chronologies remain inconsistently used. The CSPRP stated that poverty can intensify neglect but is not itself neglect, and identified wider systemic pressures, including reduced early intervention services and high caseloads, as barriers to effective safeguarding. The report proposes a national action plan focused on clarifying statutory definitions of neglect, improving the use of evidence-based assessment tools, strengthening guidance on consent and early intervention, and promoting more child-centred and coordinated safeguarding responses.