The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has published independent research commissioned from the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law examining how prosecutors in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and New Zealand discontinue criminal prosecutions. The research explores how those jurisdictions balance prosecutorial discretion, judicial oversight, victims’ rights and protections for defendants. The research identified four key findings: (1) there is no single approach to discontinuance across jurisdictions; each system seeks to balance the interests of victims, defendants and the wider public, and, in the approaches examined, broader discontinuance powers are widely accepted as operating without issue; (2) broader discontinuance powers, which permit discontinuance at a later stage than is currently possible in England and Wales, operate in several comparable legal systems; (3) safeguards combining prosecutorial flexibility with procedural controls, judicial powers and mechanisms to prevent unfair prejudice are common across the jurisdictions and (4) reinstatement of proceedings following discontinuance, while permitted in some jurisdictions, is used sparingly and requires substantive justification, such as a finding on review that the original decision was wrong.