This Agreement is made on [date] Parties 1 [insert name of Customer] [of OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at] [insert address] (Customer); and 2 [insert name of Supplier] [of OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at] [insert address] (Supplier) (each of the Supplier and the Customer being a party and together the Supplier and the Customer are the parties). Background (A) The Customer conducts the business of [insert description]. (B) The Supplier conducts the business of supplying [insert description of Services] to other businesses. (C) The parties have agreed that the Supplier shall supply the Services to the Customer on the terms set out in this Agreement. The parties agree: 1 Definitions and interpretation 1.1 In this Agreement: Affiliate • means any entity that directly or indirectly Controls, is Controlled by, or is under common Control with, another entity; Affiliate Losses • has the meaning given in clause 35.4; Best Industry Practice • means in relation to any undertaking and any circumstances, the highest degree of professionalism, skill, diligence, prudence and foresight which would be expected from an internationally

This Agreement is made on [date] Parties 1 [insert name of supplier] [of OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at] [insert address] (Supplier); and 2 [insert name of customer] [of OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at] [insert address] (Customer) (each of the Supplier and the Customer being a party and together the Supplier and the Customer are the parties). Background (A) The Supplier conducts the business of supplying [insert description of services] to other businesses. (B) The Customer conducts the business of [insert description]. (C) The parties have agreed that the Supplier shall supply services to the Customer on the terms set out in this Agreement. The parties agree: 1 Definitions and interpretation 1.1 In this Agreement: Affiliate • means any entity that directly or indirectly Controls, is Controlled by, or is under common Control with, another entity; Business Day • means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or bank or public holiday in England; Change • means any change to this Agreement including to any of the Services; Change Request • means a request submitted by a party to effect

A ‘service contract’ is a contract, other than a sales contract, under which a trader supplies or agrees to supply a service to a consumer and the consumer pays or agrees to pay the price.

An engineer specialising in the design and installation of building services. Also referred to as an M&E engineer.

This table is designed to be read together with Practice Note: VAT place of supply rules—special rules for services. The services that are listed in the table are subject to a special rule (ie an exception to the general rule) determining their place of supply for VAT purposes. The second column contains links to the part of the Practice Note that describes the rule applying to that service. In some cases, the service will only be affected by a special rule in particular circumstances (eg where it is supplied B2B or B2C)—if this is relevant, it is explained in the Practice Note. Accountant services B2C services

In cases in which a defendant does not provide the claimant with an address for service, the

In relation to servitudes, the owner of the servient tenement i.e. the property that is burdened by a servitude.

CASE HUB (appeals lodged at the General Court in Cases T- 680/14 (Lupin), T-682/14 (Mylan), T-679/14 (Teva), T-6824/14 (Krka), T-701/14 (Niche Generics) and T-701/14 (Unichem)) ARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the decision of 9 July 2014; it is no longer maintained. See further, timeline, commentary and related cases. Case facts Outline European Commission Articles 101 and 102 TFEU investigation into Servier and others (Perindopril) (case number COMP/39.612). The Commission issued fines totalling €427.7m on 09/07/2014. Latest developments On 9 July 2014, the Commission fined Servier and the five generic companies a combined €427.7m.Servier was fined €330.9972m, in relation to both the breaches of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.Of the generic producers:• Niche and Unichem were fined €13,968,773 (jointly and severally liable), • Matrix was fined €17,161,140 (of which its new owner Mylan Inc. is jointly and severally liable for €8,045,914),• the Teva companies were fined €15,569,395 (jointly and severally liable),• Krka was fined €10m, and• Lupin was fined €40m.The Commission opened its investigation in July 2009 and sent a Statement of Objections

The word serving can mean different things. The meaning of the word was considered in Ageas (UK) Ltd v Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd [2013] EWHC 3271 (QB) at para [54] where the judge noted that the ‘expression is one which can bear a number of different and conflicting meanings covering points in time before, on, and after receipt. For instance it can mean dispatch in the sense that a document is “served” from the point in time of its dispatch or sending and therefore prior to its receipt.’

This Practice Note considers the rules and authorities governing service of an injunction and sets out practical considerations which may arise. Interim injunctions are a form of court order which contain a penal notice. The penal notice allows the applicant to bring contempt proceedings against the respondent if they breach the injunction. To rely on the penal notice, in the event of a breach of the injunction, it will be necessary to show that the injunction was validly served. General principles Specific requirements must be met when serving an interim injunction, as seen in the Court of Appeal decision in Canada Goose: • the defendant must be named: ◦ if known, and identified—the defendant(s) must be individually named ◦ if not identified the defendant must be identifiable—such defendant(s) must be described as 'persons unknown'. Note, they must be capable of being identified and served with the order, see Service of an injunction on persons unknown below • valid method of service: ◦ service must be effected using personal service to be able to bring

Law360: Claimants pursuing legal action against the UK tax authority in England and Wales will continue to be able to serve documents by email, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) said on 18 March 2024, making the process it introduced during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic permanent.

This Practice Note considers service of court documents on unknown or anonymous defendants. It explains the two different types of unknown defendants, being those who are identifiable and those who are unidentifiable. Different approaches apply depending on which category the unknown person(s) fall into. The main way in which persons unknown can be served with court documents is by way of alternative service under either CPR 6.15 (the claim form) or CPR 6.27 (other court documents) or by dispensing with service under CPR 6.16 (the claim form) or CPR 6.28 (other court documents) although this is rarely ordered. This Practice Note should be read in conjunction with Practice Notes: Alternative service—principles and Dispensing with service of documents—principles. The provisions in CPR 6.15 and CPR 6.27 are specific to service on the defendant in the jurisdiction, it has been held that alternative service can be ordered for service on a defendant outside the jurisdiction. For guidance, see Practice Note: Alternative service—cross border considerations. General principles A claim may be commenced against an unknown or anonymous