Except as noted, all documents will be in the list of documents for both offeror and offeree. References to the ‘Code’ are to The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers and references to the ‘CA 2006’ are to the Companies Act 2006. No. Document title Code/statutory reference (where relevant) Responsibility A. Preliminary documents 1. List of documents OfferEE/OFFEROR 2. Scheme timetable OfferEE/OFFEROR 3. List of parties OfferEE/OFFEROR 4. Financial adviser’s letter to clients re: secrecy etc Rule 2.1(b) FINANCIAL ADVISER 5. Due diligence checklist OFFEROR AND (IF APPROPRIATE) OFFEREE 6. Request to search offeree share register and register of interests, and for other information concerning offeree share capital, shareholders and option holders etc CA 2006, ss 114 and 808 Note 3 on Rule 10.1 OFFEROR 7. Request for information concerning share interests CA 2006, s 793 OFFEREE/OFFEROR 8. Request for information supplied to competing offeror (if appropriate) Rule 21.3 OFFEROR 9. Memorandum for directors on legal, Code and other responsibilities Rules 2.1(b) and 19.1 OFFEROR/OFFEREE 10. Any guidelines for interviews, publicity etc (perhaps included in Memorandum for directors above) OfferEE/OFFEROR 11. Directors’ responsibility statements Rule 19.2 OFFEROR/OFFEREE 12. Directors’ powers of attorney OFFEROR/OFFEREE 13. Opening Disclosure Statements for all relevant persons, and preparations for subsequent Dealings Disclosures Rule 8 all parties 14. Website notification, if required Rule 30.2 OfferEE/OFFEROR (as appropriate) 15. Engagement letter with financial advisers OFFEROR AND OFFEREE/FINANCIAL ADVISERS 16. Engagement

In the [insert REGION ]employment tribunal Case no: [Insert case number] Between: [INSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT] Claimant and [INSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT] Respondent ____________________________ [CLAIMANT’S OR RESPONDENT’S OR AGREED] LIST OF ISSUES ___________________________ Jurisdiction 1 Was the claim presented in time? (Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (AWR 2010), SI 2010/93, reg 18(4)) 2 If not, in all the circumstances of the case, is it nonetheless just and equitable for the employment tribunal to consider the claim? (AWR 2010, SI 2010/93, reg 18(5)) 3 Was the Claimant an ‘agency worker’ for the purposes of the AWR 2010, SI 2010/93, reg 3? Day one rights 4 Did the hirer treat the Claimant less favourably than a comparable direct hire in relation to collective facilities and amenities, namely canteen or other similar facilities, child care facilities, and transport services? (AWR 2010, SI 2010/93, reg 12) The

In the [insert REGION ]employment tribunal Case no: [Insert case number] Between: [INSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT] Claimant and [INSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT] Respondent ____________________________ [CLAIMANT’S OR RESPONDENT’S OR AGREED] LIST OF ISSUES ___________________________ Jurisdiction 1 Was the Claimant an employee or apprentice? (Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order, SI 1994/1623, Art 3) 2 Is the claim one that a court in England and Wales or Scotland would have jurisdiction to hear and determine and within one of the following categories (SI 1994/1623,

In the [[insert Region]] employment tribunal Case no: [Insert case number] Between: [INSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT] Claimant and [INSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT] Respondent ____________________________ [CLAIMANT’S OR RESPONDENT’S OR AGREED] LIST OF ISSUES ___________________________ Jurisdictional issues Time limits 1 Were the claims brought in time, taking into account the effect of the ‘stop the clock’ provisions in respect of early conciliation? (EqA 2010, ss 123(1)(a) and 140B) 2 In respect of the claims that are based on the Respondent’s failure to do something, when is the Respondent to be treated as having decided those things? (EqA 2010, s 123(4)) [The Claimant relies on [insert details, eg a decision not to alter the Claimant’s working hours on [insert date]].] 3 In respect of any complaints which are out of time, do they form part of a continuing act, taken together with acts which are in time? (EqA 2010, s 123(3)(a)) 4 If the complaints were not submitted in time, would it be just and equitable to extend time? (EqA 2010, s 123(1)(b)) The Claimant relies on [insert details, eg ‘a period of severe ill-health’, ‘attempts to seek an internal resolution of their complaints before submitting tribunal proceedings’, ‘receiving erroneous legal

In the [[INSERT Region]] employment tribunal Case no: [Insert case number] Between: [INSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT] Claimant and [INSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT] Respondent ____________________________ [CLAIMANT’S OR RESPONDENT’S OR AGREED] LIST OF ISSUES ___________________________ Jurisdictional issues Time limits 1 Were the Claimant's claims brought in time, taking into account the effect of the ‘stop the clock’ provisions in respect of early conciliation? (Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), ss 123(1)(a) and 140B) 2 In respect of the Claimant’s complaints which are based on the Respondent’s failure to do something, when is the Respondent to be treated as having decided those things? (EqA 2010, s 123(4)) 3 In respect of any complaints which are out of time, do they form part of a continuing act, taken together with acts which are in time? (EqA 2010, s 123(3)(a)) 4 If the complaints were not submitted in time, would it be just and equitable to extend time? (EqA 2010, s 123(1)(b)) [The Claimant relies on [insert particulars of why the Claimant says it would be just and equitable to extend time, eg ‘a period of significant ill-health’ ‘their attempts to seek an internal resolution of their complaints

In the [insert REGION ]employment tribunal Case no: [Insert case number] Between: [INSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT] Claimant and [INSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT] Respondent ____________________________ [CLAIMANT’S OR RESPONDENT’S OR AGREED] LIST OF ISSUES ___________________________ Jurisdiction 1 Was the claim presented in time? (ERA 1996, s 80H(5)(a)) 2 If not, was it not reasonable practicable to present it in time and was it presented within such further period as the tribunal considers reasonable? (ERA 1996, s 80H(5)(b)) 3 Is the Claimant an employee? (ERA 1996, ss 80H(1), 230(1)) The

In the [insert REGION ]employment tribunal Case no: [Insert case number] Between: [INSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT] Claimant and [INSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT] Respondent ____________________________ [CLAIMANT’S OR RESPONDENT’S OR AGREED] LIST OF ISSUES ___________________________ Jurisdiction 1 Is the Claimant an employee or a worker? (ERA 1996, ss 44, 49A, 230(1), (3)) 2 Was the claim presented in time? (ERA 1996, s 48(3)(a)) 3 If not, was it: 1 not reasonably practicable for the complaint to be presented in time, and 2 the complaint was presented within such further period as is considered reasonable in the circumstances? (ERA 1996, s 48(3)(b)) Liability Did the Respondent subject the Claimant to a detriment? (ERA 1996, s 44(1), (1A)) The Claimant relies on: [insert details of act or omission relied

In the [insert REGION ]employment tribunal Case no: [Insert case number] Between: [INSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT] Claimant and [INSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT] Respondent ____________________________ [CLAIMANT’S OR RESPONDENT’S OR AGREED] LIST OF ISSUES ___________________________ Statutory redundancy payment Entitlement 1 Was the Claimant an employee? (Employment Rights Act 1996, s 230(1) (ERA 1996)) 2 Was the Claimant dismissed? (ERA 1996, s 136) 3 If so, was the dismissal by reason of redundancy? (ERA 1996, ss 139, 163(2)) 4 What is the ‘relevant date’ in relation to the dismissal of the Claimant? (ERA 1996, s 145)? 5 Did the Claimant have at least two years of continuous employment as at the relevant date to be entitled to a statutory redundancy payment? (ERA 1996, s 155) 6 Did the Claimant unreasonably refuse an offer of suitable alternative employment and thereby lose the right to a statutory redundancy payment? (ERA 1996, s 141) Time limits 7 Did at least one of these things happen before the end of the period of six months beginning with the relevant date: 7.1 the payment was agreed and paid; 7.2 the Claimant made a claim for the payment by notice in writing to the Respondent; 7.3 a question as to the Claimant’s right to, or the

In the [insert REGION ]employment tribunal Case no: [Insert case number] Between: [INSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT] Claimant and [INSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT] Respondent ____________________________ [CLAIMANT’S OR RESPONDENT’S OR AGREED] LIST OF ISSUES ___________________________ Jurisdiction: time limits 1 Did the Claimant submit their claim in time, taking into account the effect of the ‘stop the clock’ provisions in respect of early conciliation? (Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), ss 111(2)(a), 207B) 2 If not, was it not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to submit the claim in time? (ERA 1996, s 111(2)(b)) 3 If so, did the Claimant submit the claim within such further period as was reasonable? (ERA 1996, s 111(2)(b)) Jurisdiction: employment status 4 Was the Claimant an employee of the Respondent within the meaning of section 230(1) of the ERA 1996? [ Jurisdiction: entitlement to bring claim 5 As at the effective date of termination, did the Claimant have a sufficient period of continuous employment to be entitled to bring a claim of unfair dismissal? (ERA 1996, s 108(1))] Dismissal 6 Was the Claimant dismissed? (ERA 1996, s 95) 7 If the Claimant relies on constructive dismissal, did they resign in circumstances in which they were entitled to treat themselves as having been constructively dismissed? (ERA

In the [insert REGION ]employment tribunal Case no: [Insert case number] Between: [INSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT] Claimant and [INSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT] Respondent ____________________________ [CLAIMANT’S OR RESPONDENT’S OR AGREED] LIST OF ISSUES ___________________________ 1 Is the Claimant a worker? (Employment Rights Act 1996, s 203(3) (ERA 1996)) 2 Was the total amount of wages paid to the Claimant less than the amount of wages properly payable (ie was there a deduction)? (ERA 1996, s 13(3)) The Claimant

In the [insert Region] employment tribunal Case no: [Insert case number] Between: [INSERT NAME OF CLAIMANT] Claimant and [INSERT NAME OF RESPONDENT] Respondent ____________________________ [CLAIMANT’S OR RESPONDENT’S OR AGREED] LIST OF ISSUES ___________________________ Jurisdiction—time limits 1 In relation to the detriment claim, did the Claimant submit their claim in time, taking into account the effect of the ‘stop the clock’ provisions in respect of early conciliation? (Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), ss 48(3)(a), 207B) 2 If not, was it not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to submit the claim in time? (ERA 1996, s 48(3)(b)) 3 If so, did the Claimant submit the claim within such further period as was reasonable? (ERA 1996, s 48(3)(b)) 4 In relation to the dismissal claim, did the Claimant submit their claim in time, taking into account the effect of the ‘stop the clock’ provisions in respect of early conciliation? (ERA 1996, ss 111(2)(a), 207B) 5 If not, was it not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to submit the claim in time? (ERA 1996, s 111(2)(b)) 6 If so, did the Claimant submit the claim within such further period as was reasonable? (ERA 1996, s 111(2)(b)) Jurisdiction—status 7 In relation to the dismissal claim, was the Claimant an employee

The pan-European classification system of wastes, formerly known as the European Waste Catalogue.