This Practice Note provides guidance on different approaches to delivering learning and development (L&D) and covers: • factors to consider when selecting learning methods • learning methods • learning styles Factors to consider when selecting learning methods A wide range of methods for learning, training and development exist that can be used to meet learning needs. The choice of learning method for each identified need will depend on several factors including: • the nature and priority of the learning need • the location of the learner • the level of seniority and qualifications of the learner • the subject matter • organisational culture • evaluation of the effectiveness of previous learning activities and events • costs and budgets available • learning styles When designing a learning and development (L&D) programme it is essential to understand from the outset that one size will not fit all. You may need to combine a variety of learning methods to suit a number of different factors, needs and learning styles. Learning

This Practice Note provides guidance on different approaches to delivering learning and development (L&D) and covers: • factors to consider when selecting learning methods • learning methods • learning styles Factors to consider when selecting learning methods There are a wide range of methods for learning, training and development that can be used to meet learning needs. The choice of learning method for each identified need will depend on several factors including: • the nature and priority of the learning need • the level of seniority and qualifications of the learner • the location of the learners if the firm has a remote or hybrid working arrangement • the subject matter • organisational culture • evaluation of the effectiveness of previous learning activities and events • costs and budgets available • learning styles • inclusivity and accessibility, eg neurodiversity and disability issues When designing a learning and development (L&D) programme it is essential to understand from the outset that one size will not fit all. You

This Checklist sets out the key issues that legal representatives and/or litigants seeking commercial third-party funding should consider in advance of approaching a funder. You may also find the following other checklists useful in this area: • Key documents and information required by funders—checklist • What funders look for—checklist Issues and considerations Comments Lawyer/litigant notes Finding a funder How do you go about identifying and choosing a funder that offers the type of funding looked for? There are various differences between funders, including in relation to the types of cases that they are willing and able to fund. There are various ways in which you might identify a funder for your case, including:● speaking to colleagues and peers who have worked with funders● approaching a broker (see further below)● reviewing the website of the Association of Litigation Funders of England and Wales (for domestic funders)● considering directory entries (both Chambers and Partners and Legal 500 now have rankings for litigation funders)● checking the Law Society’s Litigation Funding magazine● researching

Introduction The Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) requirements require the assessment of 'plans or projects' that may have a 'likely significant effect' on a European site. Such plans or projects can only proceed if the competent authority is convinced they will not have an 'adverse effect on the integrity of a European site'. If the plan or project will have adverse effects, or if there is uncertainty over its effects, it can only be granted consent if certain 'derogations' apply. See Practice Notes: Implementation of the EU Habitats Directive in England and Wales and Appropriate assessment/habitats regulations assessment. Screening Is the proposed activity a 'plan or project'? The HRA requirements only apply to 'a plan or projects'. The legislation does not define the terms 'plan or project' but they are generally taken to have a very broad meaning, covering a wide range of activities. If the activity is not a plan or project, there is no need for screening to see whether an appropriate assessment is required. However, other consents, such as planning permission,

STOP PRESS: A revised version of the National Planning Policy Framework was published on 17 August 2026. This content is being reviewed in light of the revised version. Requirement for appropriate assessment/habitats regulations assessment Together: • Part 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 • the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (Habitats Regulations), SI 2017/1012 , in England and Wales and their respective seas up to 12 nautical miles from the coast, and • the Conservation of Offshore Marine Habitats and Species Regulations 2017, SI 2017/1013 (Offshore Regulations) which apply in UK waters more than 12 nautical miles from the coast transpose into English and Welsh law the provisions of Archived Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (as it had effect immediately before IP completion day (11 pm on 31 December 2020)). For information on how Brexit has impacted the habitats regime, see Practice Note: Brexit—the implications for English and Welsh planning law and practice. Habitats Regulations, SI 2017/1012, reg 63, requires a competent authority,

Planning analysis: In Bradbury v Brecon Beacons National Park Authority, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against a decision to grant planning permission for two developments, despite the planning committee’s failure to consider relevant information (specifically, the absence of appropriate assessments and the potential impact of the proposed development on the integrity of the River Wye Special Area of Conservation) on the basis that it was highly likely the committee would have reached the same decision even if this breach had not occurred. (R (on the application of Dr Rosalind Bradbury) v Awdurdod Parc Cenedlaethol Bannau Brycheiniog (Brecon Beacons National Park Authority)). Written by Martha Grekos, barrister at Martha Grekos Legal Consultancy.

The earlier of (1) a nominated date falling in the tax year immediately after that in which the last pension input period ended, and (2) the anniversary of the date on which the period ended

Planning analysis: Mole Valley District Council v Secretary of State & Meloney concerned a statutory review of a planning appeal decision involving the interpretation of revised national planning policy, specifically the updated National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS). It reinforces the importance of clarity in applying national policy, the evidential burden on local authorities in demonstrating deliverable housing supply, and the procedural expectations in adversarial hearings. Written by Rory Bennett, counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright LLP.

Under the Pension Schemes Act 2015 and underlying regulations, 'appropriate independent advice' is defined as advice that is: • given by an authorised independent adviser who has permission under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to carry out the regulated activity of advising on the conversion or transfer of pension benefits, and • specific to the transfer payment, conversion of benefits or payment of a lump sum proposed by the member or survivor

SCCO Guide—the office in which a request for a detailed assessment hearing should be filed: it is the County Court Office or District Registry for the court in which the order for costs was made or, in all other cases, the Senior Court Costs Office (SCCO). Where the SCCO is the appropriate office for the request, it is also the appropriate office for any request or application made earlier in the detailed assessment proceedings, eg, a request for a default costs certificate, a request or application to set aside such a certificate and applications for extension of time and sanctions for delay

A personal pension plan, stakeholder pension scheme or FSAVC scheme which had received an appropriate scheme certificate by HMRC, enabling its members to contract out of the state second pension.

A personal pension which provided for an employed person a S2P benefit through a personal arrangement with a bank, building society, insurance company or unit trust.