The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has published a review of the UK’s design protection framework, providing an evidence-based assessment of how the regime operates and identifying policy considerations for potential reform. The review follows the government’s 2025 consultation on modernising UK designs law and was prepared by Professors Bruce Tether and Estelle Declaye, drawing on legal and economic analysis, case law, registration data and a survey of 501 UK design-active firms. It finds that the UK design economy is significant in scale and, in some respects, comparable to patent-intensive sectors, but that registered design rights appear to be underused, including in highly design-intensive industries. The report notes that the current framework comprises two unregistered design rights (UK unregistered design right (UDR) and supplementary UDR), registered design rights and overlapping copyright protection, creating a layered system that may contribute to confusion, with survey evidence indicating limited awareness and understanding of unregistered rights. It further finds that annual UK design registrations have increased since Brexit to approximately 70,000–80,000 filings across a wide range of sectors, although most UK firms register only one or two designs. The review also identifies instances of registrations being used in online marketplace settings to block competitors and reports that around one quarter of surveyed firms experienced recent copying of their designs, although many disputes were resolved without substantial cost or delay.