In legal practice, a “holding” is the court’s determination of the legal principle necessary to decide the dispute on the facts before it. It is the binding part of a judgment, contrasted with obiter dicta, which are persuasive but not essential comments. Across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, the term is used consistently in case law analysis rather than being defined in statute. The holding is found in the ratio decidendi of the decision and is what lower courts must follow under the doctrine of precedent. Identifying the holding involves isolating: (1) the material facts as found by the court, and (2) the rule of law the court applies to those facts to reach its conclusion. The concept is central to appellate practice, legal research, drafting opinions and advising clients on how a precedent applies. Distinguishing, limiting, or extending a prior decision requires precise understanding of its true holding, as opposed to its broader reasoning or factual narrative.