Tax analysis: The First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) held that HMRC was wrong to de-register the lead appellant companies for VAT, despite evidence for concluding that the VAT numbers were used for fraudulent purposes, because there was an absence of any knowledge by the directors that they were facilitating (enabling) the fraud of another, ie the organisers of that fraud. However, HMRC’s decision to terminate the appellants’ use of the VAT Flat Rate Scheme, having considered it necessary for the protection of the revenue, was reasonable, as were the assessments issued in consequence of that decision. Furthermore, the appellants did not qualify for the National Insurance Employment Allowance once it had been established that the mini-umbrella company (MUC) scheme as a whole was fraudulent. Written by Scott Redpath, barrister at Temple Tax Chambers.