This Practice Note lists key cases concerning the construction contract payment provisions of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996) as amended by the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009. For further guidance, see Practice Notes: Interim payments in construction contracts and Interim payments in construction contracts. In relation to interim payments, see also Practice Note: Interim payments in construction contracts. CAUTION: From December 2014 (when judgment was handed down in ISG v Seevic) up until February 2018 (when judgment was handed down by the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) in Grove v S&T), payment cases proceeded on the basis that, where a paying party failed to give a payment or pay less notice in relation to an interim payment, it was deemed to have agreed to the amount stated in the payee’s payment application/default payment notice. Accordingly, in relation to the relevant interim payment, the paying party could not then challenge the ‘true value’ of the works in adjudication (or otherwise). Following Grove v S&T, which has