This Practice Note provides coverage of the corporate governance guidelines relating to executive director remuneration reporting and shareholder voting as laid down by the main proxy advisors to institutional investors. It covers the guidance of the IA, Pensions UK, Glass Lewis and PIRC. Other guidance is also referred to, including from the GC100 and Investor Group, the QCA and the AIC. Recent debate over directors’ remuneration The remuneration of quoted company executive directors is subject to greater shareholder, media and political scrutiny than ever before. In addition to the legislation and corporate governance regulation relating to executive remuneration, proxy advisors such as the Investment Association (IA), Pensions UK (formerly PLSA), Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), Glass Lewis, the Local Authority Pension Fund Forum (LAPFF) and Pensions & Investment Research Consultants Ltd (PIRC) each produce their own guidelines on executive remuneration and make recommendations to their institutional shareholder members on voting strategy and other aspects of good stewardship. Given the significant shareholdings in listed companies held by institutional investors and the fact that many investors rely heavily on proxy