Dispute Resolution analysis: A recent decision has ruled that a judgment for non-proprietary relief, namely, a money judgement, can be made against unidentifiable crypto-currency defrauders. This decision goes against Boonyaem v Persons Unknown Category (A) where the court ruled that it could not give judgment for any kind of non-proprietary relief (including damages to be assessed) against unidentifiable crypto-currency defrauders. The distinction that the judge drew was that, in the present case, the claimant had managed to effect service on the unidentifiable crypto-currency defrauders, whereas Boonyaem applied a case about the impossibility of service, which meant the impossibility of asserting jurisdiction, and therefore, judgment. Here, the court held that where jurisdiction can be established by ‘alternative service’, then there is no prima facie reason for such jurisdiction to disallow the very purpose for which it is initially invoked, for the claimant to obtain a judgment. Written by Jason Raeburn, partner, and Georgina Morris, associate, at Paul Hastings (Europe) LLP.