Employee issues on insolvency

Introduction

When a company becomes insolvent, the position of the employees can be key. If the business is being rescued as a going concern then it is hoped that jobs will be saved.

For that to be possible, employees may need some reassurance on their position to avoid them jumping ship, which for some businesses may have the consequence that there is then no longer any company or business of substance to be rescued. The need to get key employees on side early on must be balanced with the need to maintain confidentiality when negotiating a rescue and not causing panic in the company and amongst creditors if word of a potential deal spreads.

If the business continues in some format then the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE 2006), SI 2006/246 will apply to transferring employees. If there is no hope of a rescue deal and an employee transfer, then it is important that employees' arrears are dealt with in accordance with statutory considerations.

The position of an employee on a company's insolvency

The general rule is that a contract of employment

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :

Popular documents