Proof of debt

Proofs of debt

The rules applicable to proving a debt are found in the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024, rr 14.214.25 regardless of whether the insolvency proceeding in which the proof is made is an administration, winding up or bankruptcy proceeding.

A party wishing to file a claim for their debt in a compulsory liquidation, creditors’ voluntary liquidation, administration or bankruptcy must submit a written claim to the liquidator, administrator or trustee in bankruptcy. A creditor who claims is referred to as 'proving' for their debt and the document by which they seek to establish their claim is called their proof of debt.

An office-holder may treat a small debt (being £1,000 or less) as if it were proved for the purpose of paying a dividend without the need for a creditor to file a proof of debt, provided the company’s records contain evidence of the debt. The office-holder must include their intention to do so in their notice of intention to make a distribution to creditors or declare a dividend.

The creditors of a company in a members’ voluntary

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

Rational FX—court sanctions distribution plan amid regulatory uncertainty (Kicks and another v MLS-Multinational Logistics Services Ltd (a company incorporated in Malta))

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: On the 28 July 2025, the court approved a distribution plan in the special administration of Rational Foreign Exchange Ltd (RFX), enabling the joint special administrators (Kristina Kicks and Edward Boyle of Interpath) (Special Administrators) to return safeguarded funds to customers. The Special Administrators also sought declaratory relief regarding the status of European domiciled customers, following the repeal of passporting rights under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 (PSR 2017) post-Brexit. RFX employed various methods to continue servicing European clients, some lacking proper regulatory basis. This required the Special Administrators to determine whether such clients were customers of RFX or separate European entities. This was a key issue given the shortfall in safeguarded funds available for distribution. The court granted the relief sought by the Special Administrators and set out guidance to assist in clarifying customer status. This case marks only the second reported judgment approving a distribution plan in respect of a payment services firm under rule 114 of the Payment and Electronic Money Institution Insolvency Regulations 2021 (2021 Regulations), and the first involving European domiciled business and a significant shortfall in safeguarded funds. In absence of specific guidance under the 2021 Regulations and the Payment and Electronic Money Institution Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2021 (2021 Rules), the court applied among other things the three-stage test from Re SVS Securities Plc assessing; (i) fairness and reasonableness of the proposed distribution; (ii) progress of the special administration; and (iii) adequacy of stakeholder engagement. Written by Brian Rostron, associate and Kelvin Riley, associate at Addleshaw Goddard LLP.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :

Popular documents