Since the turn of this century, successive governments have been seeking to clamp down on perceived tax avoidance by wealthy individuals by way of stricter anti-avoidance rules with wider scope as to what constitutes tax avoidance, increased powers for HMRC and harsher penalties.
Historically, offshore arrangements have been widely used by UK resident and domiciled individuals as well as UK resident non-domiciliaries to avoid UK taxation. The government's stance on offshore tax planning has hardened significantly over the years and to limit the scope for tax planning a series of anti-avoidance measures have been introduced. Initially, such measures were mainly aimed at UK-domiciled individuals, but since 2008, non-domiciliaries have increasingly been targeted by measures sought to restrict the benefits achieved through the remittance basis of taxation. With effect from 6 April 2025, it is an individual’s long-term residence status in the UK, rather than their domicile, which is relevant in their liability to tax and the application of anti-avoidance measures, although there are transitional measures. For more information, see Practice Note: Fast find content on the changes to the taxation of non-domiciled individuals...
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
**Trials are provided to all LexisNexis content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisNexis services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
Law360, London: Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, has been urged to introduce a tax on 'extreme wealth' in the upcoming Autumn Budget 2026, a coalition...
Private Client analysis: The Court of Protection held that continuing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) for TB, a 19-year-old man in...
This week’s edition of Private Client highlights includes: (1) the Family Division issues a limited grant to arrange cremation in accordance with the...
Tax analysis: In Cogefin, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) held that a Bermudian company was UK resident because its central management and control...
Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a
Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid
If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit
Glossary—Latin legal termsDespite attempts in recent years to simplify the language used in legal cases, there are still a number of Latin phrases commonly used in personal injury claims. The following Latin phrases are listed in alphabetical order:Latin termDefinitionMeaningActa iure imperiiLegal
0330 161 1234